White & Case LLP - Lawyers and Advisors

Services	Sectors
Antitrust Asset Finance Banking Canada Capital Markets Climate Change Commercial Litigation Data Privacy Employment & Benefits Financial Restructuring and Insolvency India Indonesia Intellectual Property International Arbitration International Trade Israel Korea Latin America Mergers & Acquisitions Private Clients Pro Bono Project Finance Sovereign Wealth Funds Sovereigns Spain Taiwan Tax White Collar	Communications and Media Construction Environmental Funds Islamic Finance Mining and Metals Oil & Gas Pharmaceuticals and Healthcare Power Real Estate Sourcing & Technology Transactions

North America	Latin America	Europe		Asia	Middle East/Africa
Los Angeles Miami New York Silicon Valley Washington, DC	Mexico City Monterrey São Paulo	Almaty Ankara Berlin Bratislava Brussels Bucharest Budapest Düsseldorf Frankfurt Geneva Hamburg	Helsinki Istanbul London Milan Moscow Munich Paris Prague Stockholm Warsaw	Beijing Hong Kong Shanghai Singapore Tokyo	Abu Dhabi Doha Johannesburg Riyadh

Eric Lancaster is an associate in White & Case's Intellectual Property Practice Group. His practice focuses primarily on patent litigation, covering a variety of technologies including microprocessors, memory chips, CMOS image sensors, software and disk drives. Mr. Lancaster's patent litigation experience includes pre-filing activity, discovery, claim construction briefing, summary judgment briefing and in drafting briefs for matters before the US International Trade Commission.

During law school, and currently as an alumnus, Mr. Lancaster enjoys his role as an alumnus member of the Galloway Moot Court Board at Santa Clara University School of Law.

Some examples of Eric's work include:

American Imaging Services, Inc. v. Autodesk, Inc. (2010) Represented Autodesk in a patent litigation matter involving CAD software.
Panavision Imaging v. OmniVision, et al. (2010) Represented Panavision Imaging in an action asserting four patents against Defendant's CMOS image sensors.
MOSAID v. Micron, et al. (2009) Represented MOSAID in a multiple patent case involving memory and CMOS imaging chip technology. The case proceeded in both the Eastern District of Texas and the Northern District of California and was settled with all parties taking a license to the patents-in-suit after the Markman hearing but before the Markman decision was issued.
Alberta Telecommunications Research Centre v. Rambus Inc. (2009) Represented Rambus in a patent litigation matter involving clock synchronization technology.
Stormedia v. HGST et al. (2008) Represented Hitachi Global Storage Technologies in the Eastern District of Texas in a multi-defendant patent litigation matter involving disc drives which resulted in an early settlement after initial invalidity contentions.

	Eric Lancaster
Download vCard Expertise Intellectual Property	Associate Silicon Valley T: + 1 650 213 0324 F: + 1 650 213 8158 E: *Practice Experience* Eric Lancaster is an associate in White & Case's Intellectual Property Practice Group. His practice focuses primarily on patent litigation, covering a variety of technologies including microprocessors, memory chips, CMOS image sensors, software and disk drives. Mr. Lancaster's patent litigation experience includes pre-filing activity, discovery, claim construction briefing, summary judgment briefing and in drafting briefs for matters before the US International Trade Commission. During law school, and currently as an alumnus, Mr. Lancaster enjoys his role as an alumnus member of the Galloway Moot Court Board at Santa Clara University School of Law. Some examples of Eric's work include: American Imaging Services, Inc. v. Autodesk, Inc. (2010) Represented Autodesk in a patent litigation matter involving CAD software. Panavision Imaging v. OmniVision, et al. (2010) Represented Panavision Imaging in an action asserting four patents against Defendant's CMOS image sensors. MOSAID v. Micron, et al. (2009) Represented MOSAID in a multiple patent case involving memory and CMOS imaging chip technology. The case proceeded in both the Eastern District of Texas and the Northern District of California and was settled with all parties taking a license to the patents-in-suit after the Markman hearing but before the Markman decision was issued. Alberta Telecommunications Research Centre v. Rambus Inc. (2009) Represented Rambus in a patent litigation matter involving clock synchronization technology. Stormedia v. HGST et al. (2008) Represented Hitachi Global Storage Technologies in the Eastern District of Texas in a multi-defendant patent litigation matter involving disc drives which resulted in an early settlement after initial invalidity contentions. *Bars and Courts* California State Bar, 2006 US District Court for the Northern District of California US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas *Education* JD, Santa Clara University School of Law, 2006 BA & BS (Economics and Chemistry), University of California, Davis, 2002 *Languages* English *Citizenship* United States