ParkCentral v. Porsche: The Second Circuit Signals New Line of Defense to Extraterritorial Securities Fraud Claims | White & Case LLP International Law Firm, Global Law Practice
ParkCentral v. Porsche: The Second Circuit Signals New Line of Defense to Extraterritorial Securities Fraud Claims

ParkCentral v. Porsche: The Second Circuit Signals New Line of Defense to Extraterritorial Securities Fraud Claims

In ParkCentral Global Hub Ltd. v. Porsche Automobile Holdings SE ("ParkCentral"), the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that domestic securities transactions that did not involve the foreign defendant, whose alleged fraudulent actions occurred largely abroad and related to price movements in non-US securities, were beyond the territorial scope of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. While the Second Circuit firmly declined to provide a “bright-line” rule as to when a claim is so foreign as to be beyond the scope of US securities laws, the holding is another in a series of Second Circuit decisions that should make it harder for claimants to sustain US securities claims against non-US issuers of non-US securities. However, it also shows that the extraterritorial scope of Section 10(b) is a fact-sensitive question that will require careful analysis in each case.

Click here to download PDF.

 

This publication is provided for your convenience and does not constitute legal advice. This publication is protected by copyright.
© 2014 White & Case LLP