On August 31, 2012, the Federal Circuit, sitting en banc, loosened the requirements for proving induced infringement of method claims. In a 6-5 split decision in the cases of Akamai Tech., Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc. and McKesson Tech., Inc. v. Epic Systems Corp., Nos. 2009-1372, -1380, -1416, -1417 and 2010-1291 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 31, 2012), the Federal Circuit overruled its previous 2007 decision in BMC Resources, Inc. v. Paymentech, L.P., 498 F.3d 1371 (Fed. Cir. 2007) and held that a defendant may be liable for inducing infringement of a method claim, even when all steps of the claim are not committed by a single entity. Maj. Op. 10. While some hailed this decision as closing what has been perceived as a loophole that allows entities to escape infringement liability under certain circumstances, others expressed concern about the potential for abuse and an expansion of liability beyond what was contemplated by Congress in 35 U.S.C. § 271.
Click here to download PDF.
This publication is provided for your convenience and does not constitute legal advice. This publication is protected by copyright.
© 2012 White & Case LLP