Our thinking

Currents of Capital 2025 Report

Investment trends and opportunities in the global water sector

In partnership with

Discover key findings from the Currents of Capital 2025 Report

The water sector faces unprecedented challenges: escalating water scarcity, deteriorating infrastructure and intensifying climate impacts. These pressures have elevated water from a niche concern to a strategic priority for governments, corporations and institutional investors. Given that funding gaps for global water infrastructure are estimated to be in the trillions of dollars, solutions must be efficient, scalable, collaborative and financeable.

The Currents of Capital 2025 Report provides insights into how investment is flowing into water infrastructure and water-related technology and services worldwide. Our research draws on the perspectives of over 300 senior decision-makers across the global water value chain, including water utilities, multinational corporations, investment funds, engineering firms and technology providers.

Our findings reveal a growing recognition of the fundamental importance of water to economic security and sustainable development. In 2025, 96 percent of respondents plan to maintain or increase their investments in the water sector compared to 2024. This commitment is substantial. Thirty percent of respondents have deployed more than US$500 million in 2024.

However, challenges persist. Regulatory uncertainty can result in delayed investment decisions and project timelines, while the fragmentation of the water markets complicates efforts to scale solutions. The dual nature of water—as both a public good and an economic input—requires specialized investment approaches that differ from traditional infrastructure models.

In the coming years, how water is valued, managed and financed will continue to evolve. Organizations that can navigate the regulatory complexities and uncertainties in the market while harnessing technological innovation will find themselves well positioned to capture value.

More importantly, this rising tide of capital presents a historic opportunity to address global water challenges if investments are channeled toward solutions that balance economic returns with sustainability and equitable access. Our Currents of Capital 2025 Report provides insights for stakeholders seeking to navigate these currents of capital toward a sustainable water future that benefits communities, ecosystems and investors.

Rising tide: Growth projections for water investment

rising tide

Seeking familiar waters: Geographic investment priorities

water

Blended streams: The convergence of public and private capital

streams

Against the current: Navigating challenges in the global water sector

water current

Flowing forward: Emerging opportunities in the global water sector

water flowing forward

Recommendations

Water Survey Article06 Recommendations Hero

Methodology

Our Currents of Capital 2025 Report draws on insights from an experienced respondent base that represents the full spectrum of water sector stakeholders. Our survey captured perspectives from more than 300 respondents—spanning water utilities, multinational corporations, investment funds, engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) firms and technology providers—creating a unique cross-sectional view of decision-making across the entire water value chain. The respondents have substantial financial influence, with 29 percent representing organizations managing assets or generating turnover exceeding US$10 billion, 37 percent falling within the US$1-9.9 billion range and 33 percent generating between US$500 million and US$999 million. This financial diversity ensures perspectives from both industry giants and nimble mid-market players are included.

The geographic breakdown highlights a dominance of Western markets (45 percent Western Europe and 34 percent North America) while still incorporating significant representation from East Asia (8 percent), Oceania (5 percent) and emerging regions, including the Middle East (3 percent), Southeast Asia (2 percent), Africa (2 percent) and Latin America (1 percent). Most critically, these respondents have genuine decision-making authority within their organizations—81 percent of the respondents indicated they have a strong influence over water investments or priorities within their organization, while 19 percent have the ultimate decision-making authority in these areas. This combination of financial scale, geographic diversity and decision-making seniority creates a comprehensive view into the actual capital flows and strategic priorities shaping the global water sector in 2025.

water current

Against the current: Navigating challenges in the global water sector

Insight
|
3 min read

Key findings

01

Approximately nine out of ten decision-makers view water scarcity as an important challenge for the water sector

02

One-third of decision-makers identify uncertainty (both regulatory and geopolitical) as their primary challenge

03

42 percent of the decision-makers expect policy shifts in the water sector, and one in three expect tighter regulations

In today’s increasingly complex water landscape, investors and operators face a range of challenges that threaten to redirect—or, in some cases, even obstruct—strong currents of capital. Water scarcity is the sector’s primary concern, with 88 percent of the respondents identifying it as important or very important. This existential challenge is compounded by the perceived high costs of the technological innovation needed to address it, with 81 percent of respondents indicating that costs were an important or very important challenge. Some leaders argue that a narrow focus on upfront technology costs obscures the broader value calculation. 

“In terms of costs, we don’t have a technology problem, we have a ‘value of water’ problem,” says Devesh Sharma, CEO at Aquatech International. “People will say that technology is expensive, but what’s the alternative? Against what is the cost being measured? The costs of inaction will be much higher. The technology is out there and it can always improve. What’s more important is whether the business model, financial model and regulatory environment are positioned to support,” explains Sharma.

The importance of the regulatory environment was underscored in other findings. Survey analysis shows that uncertainty is one of the most significant operational obstacles for organizations in the water sector, with just over one in three highlighting volatile business environments (including regulatory uncertainty or geopolitical risk) as their primary challenge. The data reveals that 24 percent of the respondents identify changing regulatory frameworks as their biggest challenge, while separately, 42 percent anticipate policy shifts and 33 percent expect tightening regulations in 2025. This uncertainty is likely to create a ripple effect through investment decisions, extend timelines and complicate financial projections. President Trump’s tariff announcements are very likely predictive of the nature of the regulatory environment in which organizations in the water sector will operate in the short to medium term. Only time will tell what impact the recent tariff announcements will have on an already sensitized sector. 

“Regulatory uncertainty extends project development cycles and increases costs, making it one of the biggest challenges across all types of water projects,” says Lihy Teuerstein, CEO, IDE Water Assets. “Regionalized water management approaches could transform how we address this uncertainty. By scaling beyond fragmented local jurisdictions, we can distribute costs, build redundancy between water sources and create a portfolio perspective that allocates different water qualities to their optimal uses – but this requires overcoming entrenched local politics and finding decision-makers willing to champion a more holistic vision.”

Regional variations reveal distinct patterns that may inform and direct targeted jurisdiction-specific strategies to address perceived challenges. Looking at the key challenges identified by region, respondents in Latin America, Southern Europe and Oceania cite insufficient funding as a top challenge while respondents in Central, Eastern and Southern Europe identify a lack of reliable investment data and slow returns on investment as a challenge.

For financial stakeholders, the challenges are even more acute. Infrastructure and pension funds cite scarcity of suitable investment opportunities, while private equity respondents identified extended timelines and uncertain returns. Meanwhile, water utilities and operators remain caught between increasing compliance requirements and insufficient funding to meet them.

The geopolitical environment adds another layer of complexity, with 13 percent of respondents citing it as their primary challenge. Organizations must now navigate not only local regulatory environments but also contend with supply chain disruptions, trade tensions and climate-related regulations that vary across the different regions. Despite these challenges, there remains a strong expectation (44 percent) that governments will increase financing options through public-private partnerships, suggesting that there are mechanisms being developed to help address these challenges. Organizations that can develop strategies to manage regulatory uncertainty and address the fundamental challenges of water scarcity will be in the best position to capitalize on the opportunities that lie ahead.

White & Case means the international legal practice comprising White & Case LLP, a New York State registered limited liability partnership, White & Case LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated under English law and all other affiliated partnerships, companies and entities.

This article is prepared for the general information of interested persons. It is not, and does not attempt to be, comprehensive in nature. Due to the general nature of its content, it should not be regarded as legal advice.

© 2025 White & Case LLP

Contact us to learn more Top