Our thinking

Cybersecurity: Legal implications and risk management

What's inside

In an increasingly interconnected world, cyber risk is firmly at the top of the boardroom agenda, and having an effective data breach response programme is no longer optional.

Cybersecurity crisis management

The internet knows no borders, neither do we. Our global team of cybersecurity response experts work across borders, combining data protection, privacy, regulatory, white collar and litigation expertise in order to deliver seamless crisis management and legal advice, whenever and wherever needed.

The digitalization and free flow of information has transformed global business. However, with increased opportunities have come new and increased risks, together with complex legislative regimes that can vary significantly by jurisdiction, and are constantly evolving. Even the most conscientious company can become the victim of a cybersecurity incident, such as the stealing of client or company information, or a ransomware attack. We work with a wide range of multinational companies to manage their cybersecurity risks, developing rapid response plans, providing time-critical crisis management advice, and working with clients to manage any resulting legal issues that may arise. 

Key issues

Why?

  • Reputation
  • Fines
  • Breach of contract
  • M&A due diligence
  • Insurance
  • Proprietary information
  • Litigation
  • Criminal offences
  • Negligence

Be prepared

Risk Assessment

  • Key Information
  • Assets
  • Key Systems
  • Threat Analysis
  • Security Measures

Toolkit

  • Scripts
  • Internal and 
    External
  • Communications
  • Employee contacts
  • Response Plan
  • Live Training
  • Business Continuity Plan

Key considerations

Customer/individual rights

  • Requests for data
  • Data Protection Authority Complaints
  • Group litigation orders
  • Resolution mechanisms

B2B relationships

  • Contractual obligations
  • Contractual liability
  • Tort

Reputation management

  • Media strategy
  • Customer interaction
  • Employee engagement

Commercial

  • Proprietary
  • Information/Trade Secrets
  • System Disruption

Regulatory issues

  • Data Protection Authority
  • Financial Regulators
  • Market authorities
  • Other regulators

Privacy & data protection

  • Jurisdictions involved
  • Reporting obligations
    • individuals
    • authorities

Evidence

  • Law Enforcement Involvement
  • Legal Privilege
  • Preservation of Evidence

Response

Crisis Team

  • Legal (internal and external)
  • IT/IT Forensics
  • PR
  • Regulatory
  • DPO
  • Executive committee
  • HR
  • Vendor manager

Key Actions

  • Work with forensic investigators to:
    • Identify and contain breach
    • Gather/preserve evidence
    • Maximise legal privilege coverage
  • Contact crisis team
  • Bring in external partners
  • Identify key risks and priorities based on nature of breach
  • Assess notification requirements
  • Communications
  • Regulatory notifications

 

Articles

2025

Reform to the UK’s cybersecurity regime incoming

Changes are coming to the UK’s cybersecurity legal landscape. The new Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill aims to expand legal requirements to more sectors, tighten incident reporting rules, give the Government stronger powers to tackle cyber threats, and ramp up fines for serious breaches. 

NIS 2: One year later

Member States were required to implement the NIS 2 Directive ("NIS 2") into national law by 17 October 2024. One year on, many EU Member States have failed to meet the transposition deadline, creating confusion and increasing compliance complexity for organisations across the EU.

Cyber Resilience Act: The clock is ticking for compliance

The Cyber Resilience Act (the "CRA") entered into force on 10 December 2024 and applies in full from 11 December 2027. Manufacturers of in-scope products should start the compliance journey as soon as possible to avoid impacts to the product development cycle and non-compliance risk exposure.

Navigating NIS 2: Mastering Compliance and Risk in a Fragmented Cybersecurity Landscape

White & Case Partners John Timmons and Clara Hainsdorf explore the key issues for organizations grappling with NIS 2 compliance in light of the complex implementation landscape. 

Ransomware Payments: New legislative proposals in the UK

On 14 January 2025, the Home Office opened a public consultation (the "Consultation") on proposals seeking to address the growing threat and impact of ransomware in the UK.

data centres

2024

NYDFS Releases Artificial Intelligence Cybersecurity Guidance For Covered Entities

On October 16, 2024, the New York State Department of Financial Services (the "DFS"), under its Cybersecurity Regulation—23 NYCRR Part 500—issued a memorandum providing guidance on the risks posed by artificial intelligence ("Guidance Memo").

SEC Will Prioritize AI, Cybersecurity, and Crypto in its 2025 Examination Priorities

On October 21, 2024, the US Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") Division of Examinations ("Examination Division") announced its 2025 Examination Priorities ("Report"). Investment advisers and broker-dealers should ensure that policies, procedures and surveillance efforts related to these priorities address concerns outlined in the Report.

SEC Enforcement Heats up on Key Public Company Topics: Cyber Disclosure, Director Independence and Regulation FD

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's ("SEC") Division of Enforcement has recently brought a spate of enforcement actions relating to key topics for public companies. These include enforcement actions related to cybersecurity incident disclosure, director independence and Regulation Fair Disclosure ("Reg FD") violations, which are described below, and actions based on Section 13 and 16 beneficial ownership filings, as discussed in our prior alert.

Judge Rejects SEC’s Aggressive Approach to Cybersecurity Enforcement

On July 18, 2024, a New York federal judge dismissed most of the US Securities and Exchange Commission's ("SEC") claims against SolarWinds Corp. ("SolarWinds" or the "Company") and its Chief Information Security Officer ("CISO"), Timothy G. Brown, in connection with the Company's cybersecurity practice.

NIS 2 Directive: Navigating the challenges of implementation, impact, and scope

The NIS 2 directive establishes a regulatory framework aimed at improving the level of cybersecurity across the EU.

SEC’s Corp Fin Director Issues Statement on Cybersecurity Incident Disclosures

On May 21, 2024, the SEC's Director of the Division of Corporation Finance issued a statement on cybersecurity incident disclosures in light of the SEC's new cybersecurity disclosure rules. Our summary of this statement and key take-aways from White & Case's survey of cybersecurity disclosures is below.

2023

The SEC’s Charges Against SolarWinds and its Chief Information Security Officer Provide Important Cybersecurity Lessons for Public Companies

On October 30, 2023, the US Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") announced that it filed charges against SolarWinds Corp. ("SolarWinds" or the "Company") and its Chief Information Security Officer ("CISO") in connection with the SEC Division of Enforcement's ("Enforcement Division") investigation of a cyberattack.

SEC Adopts Mandatory Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules

On July 26, 2023, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), in a 3-2 vote, adopted rules that will require public companies to make prescribed cybersecurity disclosures.

Shaping the future of digital and cybersecurity governance

In this brief three-minute video, London-based partner Lawson Caisley, Chair of White & Case's Global Cyber Risk Committee, shares his insights on governing cyber risk at the corporate level and some of the challenges of cyber risk management in the boardroom. Filmed at the Digital Directors Network (DDN) Domino 2023 conference on digital and cybersecurity governance.

cybersecurity_square_800x800_4

Prioritizing cybersecurity at the corporate level

In this short three-minute video, Washington, DC–based partner F. Paul Pittman discusses the implications of the proposed new SEC rules on cybersecurity governance and what corporate boards can do now. Filmed at the Digital Directors Network (DDN) Domino 2023 conference on digital and cybersecurity governance.

digital mesh

Cybersecurity Developments and Legal Issues

The potential for cybersecurity threats and attacks looms large and the technology companies developing new products and services play a constant game of cat-and-mouse with hackers and cybercriminals for control of cyberspace. Here are six points to consider when analyzing cybersecurity risks and protections.

client alert image

Directors face personal liability over cybersecurity failures

In an article for The Times, White & Case partner Lawson Caisley discusses why it could become increasingly common for UK directors to "face personal liability and regulatory censure as a result of their company suffering or mishandling a cyberbreach".

wafer circuit detail

2022

Director liability for cyber breaches: transatlantic warning signs?

Two legal cases in the US in the past month suggest that regulators and prosecutors are becoming more determined to take personal action against directors and senior executives who fail to deal adequately with cyber security breaches.  

arrow

SEC Proposes Mandatory Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules

On March 9, 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") proposed rules that would require public companies to make prescribed cybersecurity disclosures.

2021

Legal 500's In-House Lawyer Magazine Autumn - Commercial Litigation Focus (Germany)

In The Legal 500's newly released In-House Lawyer Magazine a group of White & Case lawyers has contributed a legal briefing on trends in German commercial litigation.

magazine pile

AAA plc & ors v Persons Unknown: Cyber Activism or Blackmail?

In recent years, demands for payments in cryptocurrencies have become the ransom of choice for cyber extortionists and other online frauds. As a result, the English Court's powers are increasingly being called upon.

orange background

Time to Revisit Risk Factors in Periodic Reports

Ninth Circuit Decision Highlights Importance of Updating Risk Factors to Address Material Developments, including those relating to Cybersecurity Risks.

Alert 800x800

Cybersecurity Enforcement: New York Department of Financial Services issues first penalty under Cybersecurity Regulation

Consistent with its increasing activity in the cybersecurity enforcement space, in March 2021, the NYDFS issued its first penalty under the Cybersecurity Regulation. This client alert explores the settlement and offers takeaways on the areas of focus by the NYDFS in enforcement actions under the Cybersecurity Regulation.

Compensating non-material damages based on Article 82 GDPR

Is a data subject entitled to compensation from a controller or processor if the data subject's GDPR rights have been infringed, even if they have not suffered any kind of material damage? 

Corporate Boards Must Ask Key Cybersecurity Questions

Cybersecurity has been a mainstay of quarterly board agendas for years.

2020

Cybersecurity Risk: Top 5 strategies to build resilience

The fourth webinar in our 2020 Autumn Webinar Series covered crucial steps you should be taking to protect against cybersecurity threats and what you should do when disaster strikes.

Before the Dust Settles: The California Privacy Rights Act Ballot Initiative Modifies and Expands California Privacy Law

Hot on the heels of the California Attorney General's rulemaking process for the California Consumer Privacy Act ("CCPA"), California voters have passed a ballot initiative to expand and create new privacy rights for consumers.

stack of paper

US Cybersecurity Standards to Get Tougher and More Specific

In the past few years, cybersecurity has taken on increasing importance in the eyes of lawmakers and regulators.

Data Sharing Without Borders

UK law enforcement can now obtain an order against a person in or operating in the US for the production of or access to electronic data under a new ‘landmark’ US-UK data sharing agreement.

Alert 800x800

Responding to a cyber-incident

The COVID-19 crisis has exposed many companies to more cyber threats. Tim Hickman and John Timmons discuss what businesses need to do should a major incident occur.

Trending: Legal protection for cryptoasset stakeholders

Recent decisions in Singapore and New Zealand confirm that the courts are prepared to act to provide greater certainty and support to stakeholders in cryptoassets.

Recovering the ransom: High Court confirms Bitcoin status as property

The High Court has determined that Bitcoin (and other similar cryptocurrencies) can be considered property under English law, and could be the subject of a proprietary injunction. The Court granted the injunction to assist an insurance company to recover Bitcoin that it had transferred in order to satisfy a malware ransom demand.

2019

Navigating Privacy and Cyber Incident Notification and Disclosure Requirements

Organisations are facing increasing uncertainty in assessing global notification and disclosure obligations and making a determination of whether to notify or disclose a privacy violation or security incident in today's complex regulatory environment. This article offers six steps companies should consider when navigating this complex process.

Proposal on the Application of the NIS Regulations post-Brexit

This article examines the impact of the UK Network and Information Systems Regulations 2018 (SI 2018/506) (NIS Regulations) on organisations post Brexit and their obligations under applicable cybersecurity law.

Contacts

Cyber Resilience Act: The clock is ticking for compliance

Alert
|
5 min read

The Cyber Resilience Act (the "CRA") entered into force on 10 December 2024 and applies in full from 11 December 2027. Manufacturers of in-scope products should start the compliance journey as soon as possible to avoid impacts to the product development cycle and non-compliance risk exposure.

What is the CRA?

The CRA is a new EU regulation that introduces mandatory cybersecurity requirements for hardware and software products. The key objectives of the CRA include:

  • ensuring that in-scope products placed on the European market have fewer vulnerabilities, and that manufacturers remain responsible for cybersecurity throughout the product lifecycle;
  • improving transparency on security of hardware and software products; and
  • establishing resilience in the digital market in Europe and improving protections against cyber threats.

What kinds of products are caught by the CRA?

The CRA applies to "products with digital elements", meaning "a software or hardware product and its remote data processing solutions, including software or hardware components being placed on the market separately".

Taking each of these terms in turn:

  • "software" means "the part of an electronic information system which consists of computer code" (e.g., operating systems, word processing applications, etc.);
  • "hardware" means "a physical electronic information system, or parts thereof capable of processing, storing or transmitting digital data" (e.g., motherboards, microprocessors, etc.); and
  • "remote data processing solutions" means "data processing at a distance for which the software is designed and developed by or on behalf of the manufacturer of the product with digital elements concerned, the absence of which would prevent the product with digital elements from performing one of its functions" (e.g., cloud enabled functionalities provided by a manufacturer of smart home devices that enable users to control such devices).

The definition of "products with digital elements" is broad and applies to a wide range of products. For example, laptops, tablets, VR headsets, and baby monitors.

Who does the CRA apply to?

The CRA applies to manufacturers of in-scope products (e.g., a business that produces gaming devices), as well as importers (e.g., a business that brings smartphones produced by a foreign manufacturer into the European Union for sale) and distributors of in-scope products (e.g., a retailer of in-scope products).

Taking each of these terms in turn:

  • "manufacturer" means "a natural or legal person who develops or manufactures products with digital elements or has products with digital elements designed, developed or manufactured, and markets them under its name or trademark, whether for payment, monetisation or free of charge";
  • "importer" means "a natural or legal person established in the Union who places on the market a product with digital elements that bears the name or trademark of a natural or legal person established outside the Union"; and
  • "distributor" means "a natural or legal person in the supply chain, other than the manufacturer or the importer, that makes a product with digital elements available on the Union market without affecting its properties".

Key requirements

From 11 December 2027, manufacturers of in-scope products must, among other things:

  • assess the cybersecurity risks associated with an in-scope product, and take steps to mitigate those risks during the planning, design, development, production, delivery and maintenance phases;
  • ensure that in-scope products comply with the CRA's essential cybersecurity requirements, and are not placed on the market if suffering from any known vulnerabilities;
  • prepare certain technical documentation, carry out a conformity assessment, and affix the product with the CE marking;
  • take steps to address vulnerabilities and/or issues identified during the in-scope product's support period;
  • ensure that in-scope products are accompanied by certain documentation and instructions; and
  • satisfy certain transparency requirements.

Certain in-scope products are deemed to be "important" (e.g., password managers, operating systems, internet connected toys, etc.) or "critical" (e.g., smartcards, etc.), and are subject to stricter conformity assessment procedures as a result. The European Commission is empowered to amend the lists of "important" and "critical" products.

Importers and distributors will also be subject to certain requirements. For example, importers of in-scope products must ensure that relevant manufacturers have conducted the appropriate conformity assessment for in-scope products, before permitting the sale of such products in the European Union.

Reporting obligations

From 11 September 2026 (i.e.. in advance of 11 December 2027), manufacturers will be required to notify the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) and their competent Member State authority of actively exploited vulnerabilities and severe incidents affecting in-scope products. This notification must be made without undue delay, and in any event within 24 hours of the manufacturer becoming aware of the vulnerability or incident. Where necessary, follow-up reports are required within 72 hours, and final reports are required: (i) no later than 14 days after a corrective or mitigating measure is available, in the case of actively exploited vulnerabilities; and (ii) within one month of the 72 hour report, in the case of severe incidents.

Manufacturers will also be required to notify users of affected in-scope products without undue delay.

Fines

The maximum penalty that could apply for non-compliance with the CRA is the greater of: (i) €15 million; or (ii) 2.5% of global annual turnover for the previous financial year.

How to prepare

Manufacturers should:

  • begin assessing whether products being made, and which will be, available on the EU market fall within the scope of the CRA, and whether they qualify as "important" or "critical"; and
  • develop a roadmap to ensure that in-scope products will comply with the CRA requirements by 11 December 2027.

Please contact John Timmons or Joe Devine if you have any questions about the CRA, or require assistance with taking steps to comply with the incoming requirements.

Natasha Parsons (Trainee Solicitor, United Kingdom, White & Case) co-authored this publication.

White & Case means the international legal practice comprising White & Case LLP, a New York State registered limited liability partnership, White & Case LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated under English law and all other affiliated partnerships, companies and entities.

This article is prepared for the general information of interested persons. It is not, and does not attempt to be, comprehensive in nature. Due to the general nature of its content, it should not be regarded as legal advice.

© 2025 White & Case LLP

Top