Canada
The Canadian government continues to scrutinize foreign investments by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from "non-like-minded" countries.
Now in its second decade of publication, White & Case's 2026 Foreign Direct Investment Reviews continue to provide a comprehensive overview of foreign direct investment ("FDI") laws and regulations across jurisdictions worldwide.
In this edition, we offer key datapoints to help inform parties and their advisors as they evaluate the evolving challenges presented by FDI screening requirements in cross-border transactions spanning multiple countries. National security-based FDI regimes continue to proliferate globally, with many jurisdictions adopting broader definitions of investments and the sectors subject to review continuing to expand.
FDI screening regimes are entering a more mature phase, and regulators are developing a more sophisticated approach to detecting and reviewing foreign investments. It is therefore critical to consider applicable FDI requirements as transactions, whether mergers and acquisitions, joint venture agreements, public equity offerings or financial restructurings, are negotiated. A clear understanding of potential challenges, the remedies that may be required for approval and the appropriate allocation of FDI risk can help avoid unwelcome surprises related to timing, deal certainty and the execution of business plans.
With a renewed US commitment to open foreign investment from allied countries, ongoing EU cooperation on FDI screening and evolving geopolitical dynamics, FDI screening will increasingly influence the selection of investors in cross-border transactions. New initiatives by the European Commission may also result in increased coordination among FDI authorities in EU Member States, all of which have adopted their own national FDI regimes by 2026.
We continue to believe that most cross-border transactions will be successfully completed in 2026, but understanding the regulatory and institutional parameters, as well as the evolving risks associated with FDI screening, will be critical to maintaining deal certainty and timing.
The Canadian government continues to scrutinize foreign investments by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from "non-like-minded" countries.
Foreign direct investment ("FDI"), whether undertaken directly or indirectly, is generally allowed without restrictions and without the need to obtain prior authorization from an administrative agency.
The landscape of foreign direct investment ("FDI") in the United States continues to evolve under the Trump administration. With expanded jurisdiction and authorities, mandatory filings applying in certain cases, an enhanced focus on a broad array of national security considerations, further attention and resources dedicated to monitoring, compliance and enforcement, and a substantially increased pursuit of non-notified transactions, the FDI apparatus in the United States is more empowered now than perhaps at any time in its history.
The European Union continues to be a driver of foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening, with coordinated and mandatory enforcement now on the horizon.
The wide scope, low trigger thresholds and broad interpretation of the Austrian Foreign Direct Investment ("FDI") regime require a thorough assessment and proactive planning throughout the mergers and acquisitions ("M&A") process.
The Belgian foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime entered into force in July 2023. Investors and authorities alike are still coming to grips with the regime and the limited guidance available to help parties navigate it.
On July 22, 2025, the Bulgarian Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) screening mechanism entered into effect. According to information provided by the screening authority (the "Screening Council"), during its first two months of operation (September and October 2025), the Screening Council approved 10 screening applications out of 11 filed during that period. The investment in all of the above instances originated from so-called "low-risk" countries, and the applications were cleared within a short time frame. As of January 1, 2026, the Screening Council does not yet have an online register, and at present there is no information about the number of filed or pending applications. There is also no information indicating that any FDI has been prohibited or approved subject to conditions.
Croatia introduced a foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime on November 13, 2025. As of January 1, 2026, the regime is not yet operational but expected to be implemented soon.
The Republic of Cyprus' ("RoC") new Foreign Direct Investment Screening Law (the "FDIS Law") will reshape the investment landscape from April 2, 2026, introducing look-back provisions, a screening remit, internal change trigger points, and relatively low notification thresholds.
The Czech Foreign Investments Screening Act took effect in May 2021, establishing the rights and duties of foreign investors and setting screening requirements for Czech targets.
The scope of the Danish foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime is comprehensive and requires a careful assessment of investments and agreements involving Danish companies.
The relevance of Estonia's foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening mechanism has remained modest since its inception at the end of 2023 but is expected to grow in light of the geopolitical situation, on account of increased activity in the defense sector.
Foreign direct investment ("FDI") deals are generally not blocked in Finland, but the government is able to monitor and, if necessary, restrict foreign investment.
French foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening continues to focus on foreign investments involving medical and biotech activities, food security activities or the treatment, storage and transmission of sensitive data. The nuclear ecosystem is subject to very close scrutiny. Around half of the transactions reviewed every year are subject to conditions or remedies, which is an important French specificity. Recent trends also show a growing number of transactions being reviewed, suggesting a shift toward increased scrutiny of foreign investments in France.
Following numerous amendments over the past years, Germany's foreign direct investment ("FDI") review continued in full swing, with further significant updates expected in the coming years.
Greece's mandatory and suspensory foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime became fully operational on November 11, 2025. Foreign investors must comply with notification requirements and consider review timelines in deal planning.
Hungary's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regimes faced temporary headwinds in 2025, but no lasting regulatory changes ultimately took hold.
Ireland's Screening of Third Country Transactions Act entered into force on January 6, 2025.
Italy's "Golden Power Law" review: Over a decade old, yet continuously expanding its reach.
The Latvian foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime applies to companies of significance to national security, as well as companies owning or possessing critical infrastructure. While the law does not provide a general notification obligation, specific rules establish sectoral FDI regimes for certain corporate mergers and acquisitions ("M&A"), real estate transactions, and gambling companies.
All investments concerning national security are within the scope of review in Lithuania.
Two years after its entry into force, the Luxembourg foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime has reached a solid level of maturity, and its requirements are now well understood by market stakeholders. The year 2025 proved to be particularly active and dynamic for M&A transactions in Luxembourg, notably involving targets in the financial sector, with multiple FDI filings submitted.
Malta's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime regulates specific transactions that must be notified to the authorities and may, in some instances, be subject to screening.
The Middle East continues to welcome foreign investment, subject to licensing approvals and ownership thresholds for certain business sectors or in certain geographical zones.
The Netherlands is set to expand its investment screening regime by extending the general mechanism to more sectors and by introducing additional sector-specific regulations.
Norway's foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime is anchored in the Norwegian Security Act (the "Security Act" or the "Act"), which imposes mandatory filing requirements for transactions involving companies designated as security sensitive. The Act also confers wide discretionary authority on Norwegian authorities to review and intervene in transactions involving non-designated companies where national security interests may be at risk.
In 2025, Poland's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime was made permanent, and responsibility for its enforcement was transferred to the Ministry of Finance and Economy.
In Portugal, transactions involving the acquisition of control over strategic assets by entities residing outside the European Union or the European Economic Area ("EEA") may be subject to foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening.
While far-reaching in its scope, compared with other countries in the European Union, the Romanian foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime is generally perceived as investor-friendly.
The year 2025 was not marked by any major changes in the sphere of regulation of foreign investments in Russia, and the regulator continues to implement the course on strengthening control taken earlier.
The year 2025 continued with the implementation of the course set earlier in 2023 and 2024, with few substantial updates to cybersecurity legislation extending FDI regulation to new fields of business critical for the Slovak Republic.
Since 2020, certain foreign direct investments ("FDI") have been subject to scrutiny in Spain. Additional formalities have since been introduced through developing FDI regulations that entered into force on September 1, 2023. As a result, FDI analysis is becoming increasingly important in the context of investments in Spain.
Entering its third year, Sweden's foreign direct investment ("FDI") Act remains a key consideration in a significant share of transactions involving Swedish companies.
Switzerland is set to introduce its first cross-sector foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime. On December 19, 2025, the Swiss Parliament approved the new FDI Act, Investitionsprüfgesetz, establishing a review mechanism focused on foreign state-controlled investors and security-sensitive sectors. The regime is expected to take effect in 2027 at the earliest.
Sustaining economic stability and building on the strong foreign direct investment ("FDI") momentum of 2025, Türkiye continues to prioritize policies that strengthen its position as an attractive and competitive investment hub.
During September and October 2025, the Ukrainian Parliament introduced an updated foreign investment screening framework, marking a significant step toward strengthening national security controls over inbound investments.
Foreign direct investment ("FDI") is permissible in the United Arab Emirates, subject to applicable licensing and ownership conditions.
Foreign direct investment ("FDI") in the United Kingdom is covered by the National Security and Investment Act ("NSIA") 2021 (which equally applies to UK purchasers), and in 2025 the government continued to update information and guidelines concerning the legislation.
Australia's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime underwent significant changes in 2025, including measures to streamline the process for assessing investment applications. Australia's new mandatory merger clearance regime also commenced January 1, 2026.
China continues to optimize its foreign investment environment by reducing investment restrictions, improving market access, and lowering investment thresholds for listed companies.
The Indian government has liberalized foreign direct investment ("FDI") rules in certain sectors, such as the space sector, in recent years and is laying the groundwork for 100 percent foreign investment in the insurance sector, while maintaining existing restrictions on investments from sensitive jurisdictions. This reflects the government's approach toward foreign investment: welcoming foreign capital where it aligns with India's strategic goals, while continuing to protect core interests.
The Japanese government is expanding the business sectors subject to Japan's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime, which covers not only investment but also voting and other actions, to secure stable supply chains and mitigate the risk of technology leakage and diversion of commercial technologies into military use.
The Republic of Korea ("Korea") is entering a more security-focused era of foreign direct investment ("FDI") regulation, with proposed amendments to the Foreign Investment Promotion Act ("FIPA") and longer screening processes requiring foreign investors to adopt proactive regulatory planning and heightened compliance.
Significant changes to the New Zealand overseas investment regime were passed into law in December 2025 and came into force on 6 March 2026. A number of these changes have made it considerably simpler and faster for overseas investors to acquire certain classes of New Zealand assets.
Taiwan continues to promote foreign direct investment ("FDI") under a two-track screening mechanism for foreign investors and People's Republic of China ("PRC") investors.
On July 22, 2025, the Bulgarian Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) screening mechanism entered into effect. According to information provided by the screening authority (the "Screening Council"), during its first two months of operation (September and October 2025), the Screening Council approved 10 screening applications out of 11 filed during that period. The investment in all of the above instances originated from so-called "low-risk" countries, and the applications were cleared within a short time frame. As of January 1, 2026, the Screening Council does not yet have an online register, and at present there is no information about the number of filed or pending applications. There is also no information indicating that any FDI has been prohibited or approved subject to conditions.
Nikolai Gouginski and Vladislav Antonov (Djingov, Gouginski, Kyutchukov & Velichkov) authored this publication
While the new legislation introducing FDI screening entered into force on March 12, 2024, the relevant foreign investors' obligation to file for FDI clearance was not effective until the executive branch instituted additional implementing regulations. This occurred in 2025, and as of July 22, 2025, all in-scope investments are subject to clearance by the Screening Council.
In July 2025, the Bulgarian Council of Ministers (the "Bulgarian Cabinet") adopted the Regulation for Amendment and Supplementation of the Regulation for Implementation of the Investment Promotion Act (the "Implementing Regulation"). The Implementing Regulation was promulgated in the State Gazette on July 22, 2025, and as of that date the Bulgarian FDI screening mechanism became operational. The Implementing Regulation sets out, among other things, further details regarding the institutional framework and procedural aspects of FDI screening and provides a template screening application.
A foreign investor intending to make a covered FDI must file for the investment's prior clearance. The "foreign investor" concept encompasses investors based outside the EU ("non-EU persons") and includes any individual who has made, or intends to make, an FDI in Bulgaria, provided the individual is not a national of an EU Member State; and any legal entity that has made, or intends to make, an FDI in Bulgaria, provided it is seated outside an EU Member State.
Any legal entity (a "deemed non-EU entity") seated in an EU Member State but controlled by a non-EU person or another person (not necessarily an incorporated person) organized under the laws of a country that is not an EU Member State is also considered to be a foreign investor.
Additionally, any legal entity or other person (not necessarily an incorporated person) that, although seated in an EU Member State, is affected by a contract or internal rules by virtue of which the relevant investment of that person is directly or indirectly controlled by one or several individuals or legal entities established outside the EU, or makes the investment in its own name but for the account of a non-EU person or a deemed non-EU entity by virtue of an agreement, is considered to be a foreign investor.
To be subject to FDI screening, the relevant FDI must have potential effects in the areas covered by article 4, paragraph 1 of the EU Investment Screening Regulation, and: (1) result in the acquisition of at least 10 percent of the capital of an undertaking that operates in Bulgaria, or the investment amount exceeds €2 million; (2) result in the acquisition of at least 10 percent of the capital of an undertaking that operates in Bulgaria and performs high-tech activities; or (3) qualify as a "new investment" exceeding €2 million.
The quantitative criteria, however, are disregarded, so that even small but substantively in-scope investments trigger FDI screening, if there is, directly or indirectly, non-EU governmental participation in the foreign investor's capital. This extension of the FDI screening requirement to small investments does not apply where the non-EU governmental participation is linked to "low-risk" countries designated by the Bulgarian Parliament. The Investment Promotion Act (the "FDI Law") currently designates the following as "low-risk" countries: the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, South Korea, the United Arab Emirates, all members of the European Economic Area, Switzerland and Saudi Arabia.
The quantitative criteria also do not apply to FDIs by a foreign investor from Russia or Belarus, or FDIs in the production of oil-derived energy products and related critical infrastructure.
FDI screening is conducted by a specialized interagency council, the Screening Council, which is composed of specifically designated representatives of various governmental agencies. The Screening Council is supported by a secretariat (the "Secretariat") within the Bulgarian Cabinet.
A template screening application sets the scope of the information required regarding the investor, the investment and the target (if relevant). The screening application must be accompanied by documents substantiating the information provided therein, including, among other things, details on the ultimate beneficial owners of both the foreign investor and the target, the approximate investment amount, the anticipated implementation date and other information. All documents must be provided in the Bulgarian language or with a Bulgarian language translation. Documents originating from other jurisdictions must be duly apostilled or legalized in compliance with applicable bilateral or international treaties.
When assessing an FDI, the Screening Council considers whether the FDI is likely to affect security or public order, with respect to its potential to affect any of the areas covered by article 4 of the EU Investment Screening Regulation. It also considers whether the FDI is likely to affect security or public order due to: the exercise of direct or indirect control, through equity or financing, over the foreign investor by a non-EU government, including via public authorities or armed forces; the past involvement of the foreign investor in activities considered to have affected security or public order in an EU Member State; or a high level of risk of the foreign investor being involved in illegal or criminal activities.
The Screening Council has broad discretion to request information and documents and to appoint experts and solicit opinions from third parties and governmental agencies.
The review timeline is 45 calendar days from registration of the application. There is an option for a single extension of 30 additional days. If the Screening Council does not deliver a decision within this timeline, the investment is considered approved and the investor may proceed with implementation.
An FDI screening application must be submitted to the Bulgarian Investment Agency. The Agency has three days to complete formality checks and up to seven days to request additional documents or corrective steps, if necessary. Once complete, the Bulgarian Investment Agency transfers the application to the Secretariat.
The substantive review process begins when the Secretariat registers the application. It is structured as a process that may go through several consecutive stages, each with its own timeline.
The first stage of the review is carried out solely by the Secretariat. Within 14 days of commencement of the review, the Secretariat prepares and submits a reasoned proposal to the Screening Council. The Secretariat may propose one of two options: (1) there is no ground for objection to the FDI; or (ii) the Screening Council should commence a complex assessment of the FDI.
The next stage of the review is carried out by the Screening Council. Within 10 days of receipt of the reasoned proposal from the Secretariat, it either allows the FDI without complex assessment or begins complex assessment. The Screening Council issues a clearance decision where the Secretariat has found no grounds for objection and, within the first seven days after receipt of the Secretariat's proposal, no member of the Screening Council has raised objections. If no objection is raised, the Screening Council issues a clearance decision permitting implementation of the FDI.
If the Secretariat has proposed commencement of a complex assessment or an objection against a "no ground for objection" proposal has been raised, the Screening Council conducts a complex assessment.
Complex assessment is a distinct stage of the review. It is conducted by the Screening Council within the 45 days review timeline, with an option for a one-time extension of 30 additional days. The decision to extend the review period rests solely with the Screening Council. No further extension of the review period is permitted.
Following the conclusion of the complex assessment, the Screening Council either approves the FDI, approves the FDI conditionally, or rejects the screening application, thereby prohibiting the investment.
Where, during the complex assessment, the Screening Council determines that the FDI may be implemented only subject to conditions, it commences negotiations with the foreign investor. Negotiations must be completed no later than 10 days before the expiration of the review timeline (45 + 30 days). The negotiations are conducted in writing and conclude with execution of a written document either (1) setting out the terms of the agreed conditions or (2) setting out the lack of agreement on appropriate conditions. If an agreement setting out the terms of the agreed conditions is reached, the Screening Council issues permission for implementation of the FDI with conditions.
The following conditions may be adopted: restriction of the equity participation of the foreign investor to a threshold of 20 percent (10 percent if the target is involved in high-tech industries); implementation of measures aimed at the protection of personal data, information security, or otherwise (upon proposal by a relevant regulator); or introduction of special voting or management rights in favor of the government (applicable in the context of privatizations only).
If negotiations conclude without agreement on conditions, the Screening Council issues a final decision rejecting the FDI screening application.
Decisions of the Screening Council are subject to judicial review by the administrative courts.
Where a qualifying FDI has been implemented without prior clearance, the Screening Council may impose a fine on the respective foreign investor equal to 5 percent of the investment amount, but not less than €25,565. In such cases, the Screening Council may impose appropriate corrective measures, such as unwinding of control, termination of activity, termination of the FDI or other measures that may be deemed appropriate.
The Screening Council may also impose pecuniary fines equal to 5 percent of the investment amount where the foreign investor:
The Screening Council is already operational and processes screening applications. It is now expected to develop decisional practice and to address open questions relating, inter alia, to the industrial scope of application of FDI screening, calculation of thresholds in cases of indirect investment, and the exact implications of the "low-risk" country designation and exemption. The Screening Council does not yet have a website or online register, and information about its activities is not readily available. Currently, substantive reviews are conducted promptly, and decisions are typically rendered well ahead of the statutory 45 day deadline. It remains uncertain, however, whether this pace can be maintained in the future.
White & Case means the international legal practice comprising White & Case LLP, a New York State registered limited liability partnership, White & Case LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated under English law and all other affiliated partnerships, companies and entities.
This article is prepared for the general information of interested persons. It is not, and does not attempt to be, comprehensive in nature. Due to the general nature of its content, it should not be regarded as legal advice.
© 2026 White & Case LLP