Our thinking

Foreign direct investment reviews 2026: A global perspective

What's inside

As regulatory scrutiny intensifies and geopolitical tensions reshape cross-border investment, understanding the evolving global foreign direct investment landscape has become increasingly important.

Introduction

Now in its second decade of publication, White & Case's 2026 Foreign Direct Investment Reviews continue to provide a comprehensive overview of foreign direct investment ("FDI") laws and regulations across jurisdictions worldwide.

In this edition, we offer key datapoints to help inform parties and their advisors as they evaluate the evolving challenges presented by FDI screening requirements in cross-border transactions spanning multiple countries. National security-based FDI regimes continue to proliferate globally, with many jurisdictions adopting broader definitions of investments and the sectors subject to review continuing to expand.

FDI screening regimes are entering a more mature phase, and regulators are developing a more sophisticated approach to detecting and reviewing foreign investments. It is therefore critical to consider applicable FDI requirements as transactions, whether mergers and acquisitions, joint venture agreements, public equity offerings or financial restructurings, are negotiated. A clear understanding of potential challenges, the remedies that may be required for approval and the appropriate allocation of FDI risk can help avoid unwelcome surprises related to timing, deal certainty and the execution of business plans.

With a renewed US commitment to open foreign investment from allied countries, ongoing EU cooperation on FDI screening and evolving geopolitical dynamics, FDI screening will increasingly influence the selection of investors in cross-border transactions. New initiatives by the European Commission may also result in increased coordination among FDI authorities in EU Member States, all of which have adopted their own national FDI regimes by 2026.

We continue to believe that most cross-border transactions will be successfully completed in 2026, but understanding the regulatory and institutional parameters, as well as the evolving risks associated with FDI screening, will be critical to maintaining deal certainty and timing.

Americas

Canada

The Canadian government continues to scrutinize foreign investments by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from "non-like-minded" countries.

canada fdi 2022

Mexico

Foreign direct investment ("FDI"), whether undertaken directly or indirectly, is generally allowed without restrictions and without the need to obtain prior authorization from an administrative agency.

mexico fdi 2022

United States

The landscape of foreign direct investment ("FDI") in the United States continues to evolve under the Trump administration. With expanded jurisdiction and authorities, mandatory filings applying in certain cases, an enhanced focus on a broad array of national security considerations, further attention and resources dedicated to monitoring, compliance and enforcement, and a substantially increased pursuit of non-notified transactions, the FDI apparatus in the United States is more empowered now than perhaps at any time in its history.

United States

EMEA

European Union

The European Union continues to be a driver of foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening, with coordinated and mandatory enforcement now on the horizon.

european union fdi 2022

Austria

The wide scope, low trigger thresholds and broad interpretation of the Austrian Foreign Direct Investment ("FDI") regime require a thorough assessment and proactive planning throughout the mergers and acquisitions ("M&A") process.

austria fdi 2022

Belgium

The Belgian foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime entered into force in July 2023. Investors and authorities alike are still coming to grips with the regime and the limited guidance available to help parties navigate it.

Belgium

Bulgaria

On July 22, 2025, the Bulgarian Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) screening mechanism entered into effect. According to information provided by the screening authority (the "Screening Council"), during its first two months of operation (September and October 2025), the Screening Council approved 10 screening applications out of 11 filed during that period. The investment in all of the above instances originated from so-called "low-risk" countries, and the applications were cleared within a short time frame. As of January 1, 2026, the Screening Council does not yet have an online register, and at present there is no information about the number of filed or pending applications. There is also no information indicating that any FDI has been prohibited or approved subject to conditions.

Bulgaria

Croatia

Croatia introduced a foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime on November 13, 2025. As of January 1, 2026, the regime is not yet operational but expected to be implemented soon.

Croatia

Republic of Cyprus

The Republic of Cyprus' ("RoC") new Foreign Direct Investment Screening Law (the "FDIS Law") will reshape the investment landscape from April 2, 2026, introducing look-back provisions, a screening remit, internal change trigger points, and relatively low notification thresholds.

Cyprus

Czech Republic

The Czech Foreign Investments Screening Act took effect in May 2021, establishing the rights and duties of foreign investors and setting screening requirements for Czech targets.

czech republic fdi 2022

Denmark

The scope of the Danish foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime is comprehensive and requires a careful assessment of investments and agreements involving Danish companies.

Denmark

Estonia

The relevance of Estonia's foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening mechanism has remained modest since its inception at the end of 2023 but is expected to grow in light of the geopolitical situation, on account of increased activity in the defense sector.

estonia fdi 2022

Finland

Foreign direct investment ("FDI") deals are generally not blocked in Finland, but the government is able to monitor and, if necessary, restrict foreign investment.

10_finland_square_800x800_0.jpg

France

French foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening continues to focus on foreign investments involving medical and biotech activities, food security activities or the treatment, storage and transmission of sensitive data. The nuclear ecosystem is subject to very close scrutiny. Around half of the transactions reviewed every year are subject to conditions or remedies, which is an important French specificity. Recent trends also show a growing number of transactions being reviewed, suggesting a shift toward increased scrutiny of foreign investments in France.

france fdi 2022

Germany

Following numerous amendments over the past years, Germany's foreign direct investment ("FDI") review continued in full swing, with further significant updates expected in the coming years.

Germany

Greece

Greece's mandatory and suspensory foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime became fully operational on November 11, 2025. Foreign investors must comply with notification requirements and consider review timelines in deal planning.

Greece

Hungary

Hungary's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regimes faced temporary headwinds in 2025, but no lasting regulatory changes ultimately took hold.

hungary fdi 2022

Ireland

Ireland's Screening of Third Country Transactions Act entered into force on January 6, 2025.

Ireland

Italy

Italy's "Golden Power Law" review: Over a decade old, yet continuously expanding its reach.

Italy

Latvia

The Latvian foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime applies to companies of significance to national security, as well as companies owning or possessing critical infrastructure. While the law does not provide a general notification obligation, specific rules establish sectoral FDI regimes for certain corporate mergers and acquisitions ("M&A"), real estate transactions, and gambling companies.

Latvia

Lithuania

All investments concerning national security are within the scope of review in Lithuania.

Lithuania

Luxembourg

Two years after its entry into force, the Luxembourg foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime has reached a solid level of maturity, and its requirements are now well understood by market stakeholders. The year 2025 proved to be particularly active and dynamic for M&A transactions in Luxembourg, notably involving targets in the financial sector, with multiple FDI filings submitted.

Luxembourg

Malta

Malta's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime regulates specific transactions that must be notified to the authorities and may, in some instances, be subject to screening.

Malta

Middle East

The Middle East continues to welcome foreign investment, subject to licensing approvals and ownership thresholds for certain business sectors or in certain geographical zones.

Middle East

Netherlands

The Netherlands is set to expand its investment screening regime by extending the general mechanism to more sectors and by introducing additional sector-specific regulations.

Netherlands

Norway

Norway's foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime is anchored in the Norwegian Security Act (the "Security Act" or the "Act"), which imposes mandatory filing requirements for transactions involving companies designated as security sensitive. The Act also confers wide discretionary authority on Norwegian authorities to review and intervene in transactions involving non-designated companies where national security interests may be at risk.

Norway

Poland

In 2025, Poland's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime was made permanent, and responsibility for its enforcement was transferred to the Ministry of Finance and Economy.

Poland

Portugal

In Portugal, transactions involving the acquisition of control over strategic assets by entities residing outside the European Union or the European Economic Area ("EEA") may be subject to foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening.

Portugal

Romania

While far-reaching in its scope, compared with other countries in the European Union, the Romanian foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime is generally perceived as investor-friendly.

Romania

Russian Federation

The year 2025 was not marked by any major changes in the sphere of regulation of foreign investments in Russia, and the regulator continues to implement the course on strengthening control taken earlier.

Russian Federation

Slovakia

The year 2025 continued with the implementation of the course set earlier in 2023 and 2024, with few substantial updates to cybersecurity legislation extending FDI regulation to new fields of business critical for the Slovak Republic.

Slovakia

Spain

Since 2020, certain foreign direct investments ("FDI") have been subject to scrutiny in Spain. Additional formalities have since been introduced through developing FDI regulations that entered into force on September 1, 2023. As a result, FDI analysis is becoming increasingly important in the context of investments in Spain.

Spain

Sweden

Entering its third year, Sweden's foreign direct investment ("FDI") Act remains a key consideration in a significant share of transactions involving Swedish companies.

Sweden

Switzerland

Switzerland is set to introduce its first cross-sector foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime. On December 19, 2025, the Swiss Parliament approved the new FDI Act, Investitionsprüfgesetz, establishing a review mechanism focused on foreign state-controlled investors and security-sensitive sectors. The regime is expected to take effect in 2027 at the earliest.

Switzerland

Türkiye

Sustaining economic stability and building on the strong foreign direct investment ("FDI") momentum of 2025, Türkiye continues to prioritize policies that strengthen its position as an attractive and competitive investment hub.

Turkiye

Ukraine

During September and October 2025, the Ukrainian Parliament introduced an updated foreign investment screening framework, marking a significant step toward strengthening national security controls over inbound investments.

Ukraine

United Arab Emirates

Foreign direct investment ("FDI") is permissible in the United Arab Emirates, subject to applicable licensing and ownership conditions.

UAE

United Kingdom

Foreign direct investment ("FDI") in the United Kingdom is covered by the National Security and Investment Act ("NSIA") 2021 (which equally applies to UK purchasers), and in 2025 the government continued to update information and guidelines concerning the legislation.

United Kingdom

Asia-Pacific

Australia

Australia's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime underwent significant changes in 2025, including measures to streamline the process for assessing investment applications. Australia's new mandatory merger clearance regime also commenced January 1, 2026.

Australia

China

China continues to optimize its foreign investment environment by reducing investment restrictions, improving market access, and lowering investment thresholds for listed companies.

China

India

The Indian government has liberalized foreign direct investment ("FDI") rules in certain sectors, such as the space sector, in recent years and is laying the groundwork for 100 percent foreign investment in the insurance sector, while maintaining existing restrictions on investments from sensitive jurisdictions. This reflects the government's approach toward foreign investment: welcoming foreign capital where it aligns with India's strategic goals, while continuing to protect core interests.

India

Japan

The Japanese government is expanding the business sectors subject to Japan's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime, which covers not only investment but also voting and other actions, to secure stable supply chains and mitigate the risk of technology leakage and diversion of commercial technologies into military use.

Japan

Republic of Korea

The Republic of Korea ("Korea") is entering a more security-focused era of foreign direct investment ("FDI") regulation, with proposed amendments to the Foreign Investment Promotion Act ("FIPA") and longer screening processes requiring foreign investors to adopt proactive regulatory planning and heightened compliance.

Korea

New Zealand

Significant changes to the New Zealand overseas investment regime were passed into law in December 2025 and came into force on 6 March 2026. A number of these changes have made it considerably simpler and faster for overseas investors to acquire certain classes of New Zealand assets.

New Zealand

Taiwan

Taiwan continues to promote foreign direct investment ("FDI") under a two-track screening mechanism for foreign investors and People's Republic of China ("PRC") investors.

Taiwan
New Zealand

Foreign direct investment reviews 2026: New Zealand

Significant changes to the New Zealand overseas investment regime were passed into law in December 2025 and came into force on 6 March 2026. A number of these changes have made it considerably simpler and faster for overseas investors to acquire certain classes of New Zealand assets.

Insight
|
9 min read

Tessa Baker and Guy Bidwill (Chapman Tripp) authored this publication

Introduction

  • The regime is set out in the Overseas Investment Act 2005 ("OIA") and is regulated by the Overseas Investment Office ("OIO"). The tenet of the regime is that it is a privilege for overseas persons to own or control sensitive New Zealand assets, although the OIA now explicitly acknowledges the role of overseas investment in increasing economic opportunity in New Zealand.
  • For certain less sensitive investments, the starting assumption will be that the investment may proceed unless there is an identified risk to New Zealand's interests.

Summary of major recent changes

In February 2025, the government announced reform to the OIA to reverse the presumption against foreign direct investment ("FDI"), allowing overseas investment to proceed unless there is an identified risk to New Zealand's national interests.

The Overseas Investment (National Interest Test and Other Matters) Amendment Act 2025 came into force on 6 March 2026. In conjunction with the legislative changes, a new Ministerial directive letter was issued on the same date (the "MDL").

The changes better reflect the benefits international investment can bring to New Zealand's economy, while maintaining appropriate regulatory tools to manage risks to New Zealand's national interest. The scope of what is screened by the OIO has not changed, but how certain fewer sensitive assets are screened has. We summarize the key changes as follows:

  • There are three new consent pathways as follows:
    • The primary consent pathway for significant business assets and classic sensitive land (i.e. not farmland or residential land);
    • The production forestry pathway for sensitive land used for production forestry; and
    • The $5million plus house pathway for qualifying investor visa holders.
  • The rules regarding farmland, residential land and fishing quota have not changed.
  • The national interest, benefit to New Zealand, and investor tests have been consolidated into a single test for the three new consent pathways. The new test has three stages as follows:
    • Stage 1 is an initial risk assessment. If the OIO has reasonable grounds to consider that the transaction may include a risk to New Zealand's national interest, then the transaction is referred to Stage 2, otherwise consent will be granted.
    • Stage 2 is the national interest assessment. If the OIO has reasonable grounds to consider that the transaction may be contrary to New Zealand's national interest, then the transaction is referred to Stage 3.
    • Stage 3 requires the responsible Minister to decide whether or not to decline a transaction on the grounds that it is contrary to New Zealand's national interest.
  • The OIO expects that the majority of new pathway applications to be decided at Stage 1, but has noted that applicants must positively identify and address potential risk factors.
  • Investors holding an Active Investor Plus, Investor 1 or Investor 2 residency visa may apply for consent to buy or build one home worth more than NZD$5 million under the new $5million plus house pathway.

Who files?

An overseas person making an acquisition that requires consent must apply to the OIO for that consent or clearance, as applicable, before completion of the acquisition. Any agreement for an acquisition must be subject to receiving such consent or clearance.

The applicant is required to provide details of its structure, decision-making processes, how the investment will be funded and controlling individuals. For certain land applications, the applicant must also provide details of the benefits to New Zealand that would result from the investment.

An individual or entity will be considered an overseas person if they are not a New Zealand citizen, not ordinarily a resident of New Zealand or, in the case of an entity, incorporated overseas or more than 25 percent owned or controlled by overseas persons. A New Zealand citizen or entity will also be considered an overseas person if they are investing on behalf of an overseas person.

A consent application includes a filing fee that varies according to the type and complexity of the transaction and whether a national interest assessment is required.

Types of deals reviewed

Consent under the OIA is required for a range of acquisitions by overseas persons, including the acquisition of more than a 25 percent ownership or control interest in a target entity, or an increase in an existing interest to or through 50 percent, 75 percent or 100 percent.

Consent is required where the value of the applicable New Zealand assets, or consideration attributable to those assets, exceeds NZD $100 million (or an alternative monetary threshold for investors from certain jurisdictions), or where the target owns or controls, directly or indirectly, an interest in sensitive land. The definition of sensitive land is detailed and requires analysis from qualified advisers.

An overseas person establishing a business in New Zealand must obtain consent if, before commencing business, the expected expenditure incurred in establishing the business exceeds NZD $100 million (US$57.8 million), or the relevant alternative monetary threshold.

Direct acquisition of interests in sensitive land also requires consent, including the acquisition of a leasehold interest of three years or more for residential land and 10 years or more for other sensitive land, together with the acquisition of forestry rights and fishing quotas.

Consent requirements can be triggered for transactions occurring upstream of the New Zealand assets, as well as for direct acquisitions in New Zealand.

Investments in strategically important businesses, where a consent requirement is not already triggered, can, and in some cases must, be notified to the OIO for ministerial clearance. Mandatory notification is required for investments in critical direct suppliers to New Zealand's intelligence or security agencies and businesses involved in military or dual-use technology but is otherwise optional. Non-notified transactions may be reviewed by the minister before or after completion of the investment.

Scope of the review

For the three new consent pathways, overseas investors must satisfy the new national interest test. The OIO will undertake the three-stage process described above to determine whether a transaction poses a risk to New Zealand's national interest.

However, for transactions which involve farmland, residential land or fishing quota, overseas investors and controlling individuals are required to meet a bright-line investor test comprising a closed list of character and capability factors.

Parties must wait until the assessment is complete and consent is granted before completing the transaction.

Examples of investor test factors include whether the overseas investor has convictions resulting in imprisonment; corporate fines; prohibitions on being a director, promoter or manager of a company; penalties for tax avoidance or evasion; and unpaid tax of NZD 5 million or more in New Zealand or an equivalent amount in another jurisdiction.

Where the overseas investment involves certain categories of sensitive land, the overseas investor must also satisfy the benefit to New Zealand test. The requirements under the test differ depending on the nature of the land. For example, stricter provisions apply where the land is farmland.

The OIO assesses the benefits delivered by the transaction and considers factors including economic benefits, environmental outcomes, public access, protection of historic heritage and advancement of government policy. The OIO must determine whether the benefit is proportionate to the sensitivity of the land and the nature of the transaction.

A specific test must also be satisfied for investments in residential land, including increased housing, non-residential use or incidental residential use.

A mandatory national interest assessment applies to transactions involving strategically important businesses or those undertaken by foreign government investors. Supported by a cross-government committee, the minister has broad discretion to determine whether to block a transaction on the basis that it is contrary to New Zealand's national interests. The minister may address national security or public order risks by imposing conditions, prohibiting incomplete transactions or requiring disposal if completion has already occurred.

Consent to a transaction is granted with standard conditions prescribed by the OIA and, in many cases, special conditions specific to the transaction. Investors are required to report to the OIO on progress in relation to those conditions. If an overseas investor fails to comply with the conditions, the OIO can require the investment to be sold and, in cases of serious or deliberate breaches, criminal or civil penalties may be sought.

Review process timeline

Timeframes under the regulations differ depending on the nature of the application.

The statutory timeframe for a farmland application is 100 working days. By contrast, the initial risk assessment under Stage 1 of the new national interest test is be completed within 15 working days, while stages 2 and 3 have 55 working day timeframes.

These timeframes can be paused or extended by the OIO. They do not create a legal obligation enforceable in a court of law, and there is no recourse for applicants if the specified timeframe is not met.

The 2026 MDL has set out an expectation that the OIO will complete 80 percent of Stage 1 assessments in five working days, and 80 percent of all other consent applications within half the relevant statutory timeframes.

How foreign investors can protect themselves

In most circumstances, it is difficult to obtain consent under the OIA in advance of agreeing to a transaction because the consent regime screens specific transactions rather than simply identifying the investor.

It is possible for an investor to apply on a standalone basis to be screened against the investor test. However, this does not remove the need to seek consent for a specific transaction, although it may make that process easier and faster.

Where consent under the OIA is required, or where the investor is required or chooses to make a notification, the transaction should be conditional on receiving the relevant consent or clearance and must not proceed to completion until that consent or clearance is obtained.

Investors should assess early in a transaction process whether consent or notification under the OIA will be required and which tests will apply. In some circumstances, although not most, discussions with the OIO before filing can be helpful to gauge the OIO's reaction to aspects of the transaction.

Looking ahead: Likely developments in the next year

Significant changes to New Zealand's overseas investment regime have recently come into force. The OIO will be focusing on implementing its new processes and ensuring it is meeting the timeframe expectations set out in the MDL.

The current government views overseas investment as increasingly critical to New Zealand's economy, and attracting overseas investment is important for New Zealand's economic growth. However, 2026 is an election year in New Zealand and it is possible there may be election policies regarding overseas investment.

White & Case means the international legal practice comprising White & Case LLP, a New York State registered limited liability partnership, White & Case LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated under English law and all other affiliated partnerships, companies and entities.

This article is prepared for the general information of interested persons. It is not, and does not attempt to be, comprehensive in nature. Due to the general nature of its content, it should not be regarded as legal advice.

© 2026 White & Case LLP

Top