Canada
The Canadian government continues to scrutinize foreign investments by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from "non-like-minded" countries.
Now in its second decade of publication, White & Case's 2026 Foreign Direct Investment Reviews continue to provide a comprehensive overview of foreign direct investment ("FDI") laws and regulations across jurisdictions worldwide.
In this edition, we offer key datapoints to help inform parties and their advisors as they evaluate the evolving challenges presented by FDI screening requirements in cross-border transactions spanning multiple countries. National security-based FDI regimes continue to proliferate globally, with many jurisdictions adopting broader definitions of investments and the sectors subject to review continuing to expand.
FDI screening regimes are entering a more mature phase, and regulators are developing a more sophisticated approach to detecting and reviewing foreign investments. It is therefore critical to consider applicable FDI requirements as transactions, whether mergers and acquisitions, joint venture agreements, public equity offerings or financial restructurings, are negotiated. A clear understanding of potential challenges, the remedies that may be required for approval and the appropriate allocation of FDI risk can help avoid unwelcome surprises related to timing, deal certainty and the execution of business plans.
With a renewed US commitment to open foreign investment from allied countries, ongoing EU cooperation on FDI screening and evolving geopolitical dynamics, FDI screening will increasingly influence the selection of investors in cross-border transactions. New initiatives by the European Commission may also result in increased coordination among FDI authorities in EU Member States, all of which have adopted their own national FDI regimes by 2026.
We continue to believe that most cross-border transactions will be successfully completed in 2026, but understanding the regulatory and institutional parameters, as well as the evolving risks associated with FDI screening, will be critical to maintaining deal certainty and timing.
The Canadian government continues to scrutinize foreign investments by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from "non-like-minded" countries.
Foreign direct investment ("FDI"), whether undertaken directly or indirectly, is generally allowed without restrictions and without the need to obtain prior authorization from an administrative agency.
The landscape of foreign direct investment ("FDI") in the United States continues to evolve under the Trump administration. With expanded jurisdiction and authorities, mandatory filings applying in certain cases, an enhanced focus on a broad array of national security considerations, further attention and resources dedicated to monitoring, compliance and enforcement, and a substantially increased pursuit of non-notified transactions, the FDI apparatus in the United States is more empowered now than perhaps at any time in its history.
The European Union continues to be a driver of foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening, with coordinated and mandatory enforcement now on the horizon.
The wide scope, low trigger thresholds and broad interpretation of the Austrian Foreign Direct Investment ("FDI") regime require a thorough assessment and proactive planning throughout the mergers and acquisitions ("M&A") process.
The Belgian foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime entered into force in July 2023. Investors and authorities alike are still coming to grips with the regime and the limited guidance available to help parties navigate it.
On July 22, 2025, the Bulgarian Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) screening mechanism entered into effect. According to information provided by the screening authority (the "Screening Council"), during its first two months of operation (September and October 2025), the Screening Council approved 10 screening applications out of 11 filed during that period. The investment in all of the above instances originated from so-called "low-risk" countries, and the applications were cleared within a short time frame. As of January 1, 2026, the Screening Council does not yet have an online register, and at present there is no information about the number of filed or pending applications. There is also no information indicating that any FDI has been prohibited or approved subject to conditions.
Croatia introduced a foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime on November 13, 2025. As of January 1, 2026, the regime is not yet operational but expected to be implemented soon.
The Republic of Cyprus' ("RoC") new Foreign Direct Investment Screening Law (the "FDIS Law") will reshape the investment landscape from April 2, 2026, introducing look-back provisions, a screening remit, internal change trigger points, and relatively low notification thresholds.
The Czech Foreign Investments Screening Act took effect in May 2021, establishing the rights and duties of foreign investors and setting screening requirements for Czech targets.
The scope of the Danish foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime is comprehensive and requires a careful assessment of investments and agreements involving Danish companies.
The relevance of Estonia's foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening mechanism has remained modest since its inception at the end of 2023 but is expected to grow in light of the geopolitical situation, on account of increased activity in the defense sector.
Foreign direct investment ("FDI") deals are generally not blocked in Finland, but the government is able to monitor and, if necessary, restrict foreign investment.
French foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening continues to focus on foreign investments involving medical and biotech activities, food security activities or the treatment, storage and transmission of sensitive data. The nuclear ecosystem is subject to very close scrutiny. Around half of the transactions reviewed every year are subject to conditions or remedies, which is an important French specificity. Recent trends also show a growing number of transactions being reviewed, suggesting a shift toward increased scrutiny of foreign investments in France.
Following numerous amendments over the past years, Germany's foreign direct investment ("FDI") review continued in full swing, with further significant updates expected in the coming years.
Greece's mandatory and suspensory foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime became fully operational on November 11, 2025. Foreign investors must comply with notification requirements and consider review timelines in deal planning.
Hungary's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regimes faced temporary headwinds in 2025, but no lasting regulatory changes ultimately took hold.
Ireland's Screening of Third Country Transactions Act entered into force on January 6, 2025.
Italy's "Golden Power Law" review: Over a decade old, yet continuously expanding its reach.
The Latvian foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime applies to companies of significance to national security, as well as companies owning or possessing critical infrastructure. While the law does not provide a general notification obligation, specific rules establish sectoral FDI regimes for certain corporate mergers and acquisitions ("M&A"), real estate transactions, and gambling companies.
All investments concerning national security are within the scope of review in Lithuania.
Two years after its entry into force, the Luxembourg foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime has reached a solid level of maturity, and its requirements are now well understood by market stakeholders. The year 2025 proved to be particularly active and dynamic for M&A transactions in Luxembourg, notably involving targets in the financial sector, with multiple FDI filings submitted.
Malta's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime regulates specific transactions that must be notified to the authorities and may, in some instances, be subject to screening.
The Middle East continues to welcome foreign investment, subject to licensing approvals and ownership thresholds for certain business sectors or in certain geographical zones.
The Netherlands is set to expand its investment screening regime by extending the general mechanism to more sectors and by introducing additional sector-specific regulations.
Norway's foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime is anchored in the Norwegian Security Act (the "Security Act" or the "Act"), which imposes mandatory filing requirements for transactions involving companies designated as security sensitive. The Act also confers wide discretionary authority on Norwegian authorities to review and intervene in transactions involving non-designated companies where national security interests may be at risk.
In 2025, Poland's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime was made permanent, and responsibility for its enforcement was transferred to the Ministry of Finance and Economy.
In Portugal, transactions involving the acquisition of control over strategic assets by entities residing outside the European Union or the European Economic Area ("EEA") may be subject to foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening.
While far-reaching in its scope, compared with other countries in the European Union, the Romanian foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime is generally perceived as investor-friendly.
The year 2025 was not marked by any major changes in the sphere of regulation of foreign investments in Russia, and the regulator continues to implement the course on strengthening control taken earlier.
The year 2025 continued with the implementation of the course set earlier in 2023 and 2024, with few substantial updates to cybersecurity legislation extending FDI regulation to new fields of business critical for the Slovak Republic.
Since 2020, certain foreign direct investments ("FDI") have been subject to scrutiny in Spain. Additional formalities have since been introduced through developing FDI regulations that entered into force on September 1, 2023. As a result, FDI analysis is becoming increasingly important in the context of investments in Spain.
Entering its third year, Sweden's foreign direct investment ("FDI") Act remains a key consideration in a significant share of transactions involving Swedish companies.
Switzerland is set to introduce its first cross-sector foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime. On December 19, 2025, the Swiss Parliament approved the new FDI Act, Investitionsprüfgesetz, establishing a review mechanism focused on foreign state-controlled investors and security-sensitive sectors. The regime is expected to take effect in 2027 at the earliest.
Sustaining economic stability and building on the strong foreign direct investment ("FDI") momentum of 2025, Türkiye continues to prioritize policies that strengthen its position as an attractive and competitive investment hub.
During September and October 2025, the Ukrainian Parliament introduced an updated foreign investment screening framework, marking a significant step toward strengthening national security controls over inbound investments.
Foreign direct investment ("FDI") is permissible in the United Arab Emirates, subject to applicable licensing and ownership conditions.
Foreign direct investment ("FDI") in the United Kingdom is covered by the National Security and Investment Act ("NSIA") 2021 (which equally applies to UK purchasers), and in 2025 the government continued to update information and guidelines concerning the legislation.
Australia's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime underwent significant changes in 2025, including measures to streamline the process for assessing investment applications. Australia's new mandatory merger clearance regime also commenced January 1, 2026.
China continues to optimize its foreign investment environment by reducing investment restrictions, improving market access, and lowering investment thresholds for listed companies.
The Indian government has liberalized foreign direct investment ("FDI") rules in certain sectors, such as the space sector, in recent years and is laying the groundwork for 100 percent foreign investment in the insurance sector, while maintaining existing restrictions on investments from sensitive jurisdictions. This reflects the government's approach toward foreign investment: welcoming foreign capital where it aligns with India's strategic goals, while continuing to protect core interests.
The Japanese government is expanding the business sectors subject to Japan's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime, which covers not only investment but also voting and other actions, to secure stable supply chains and mitigate the risk of technology leakage and diversion of commercial technologies into military use.
The Republic of Korea ("Korea") is entering a more security-focused era of foreign direct investment ("FDI") regulation, with proposed amendments to the Foreign Investment Promotion Act ("FIPA") and longer screening processes requiring foreign investors to adopt proactive regulatory planning and heightened compliance.
Significant changes to the New Zealand overseas investment regime were passed into law in December 2025 and came into force on 6 March 2026. A number of these changes have made it considerably simpler and faster for overseas investors to acquire certain classes of New Zealand assets.
Taiwan continues to promote foreign direct investment ("FDI") under a two-track screening mechanism for foreign investors and People's Republic of China ("PRC") investors.
Significant changes to the New Zealand overseas investment regime were passed into law in December 2025 and came into force on 6 March 2026. A number of these changes have made it considerably simpler and faster for overseas investors to acquire certain classes of New Zealand assets.
Tessa Baker and Guy Bidwill (Chapman Tripp) authored this publication
In February 2025, the government announced reform to the OIA to reverse the presumption against foreign direct investment ("FDI"), allowing overseas investment to proceed unless there is an identified risk to New Zealand's national interests.
The Overseas Investment (National Interest Test and Other Matters) Amendment Act 2025 came into force on 6 March 2026. In conjunction with the legislative changes, a new Ministerial directive letter was issued on the same date (the "MDL").
The changes better reflect the benefits international investment can bring to New Zealand's economy, while maintaining appropriate regulatory tools to manage risks to New Zealand's national interest. The scope of what is screened by the OIO has not changed, but how certain fewer sensitive assets are screened has. We summarize the key changes as follows:
An overseas person making an acquisition that requires consent must apply to the OIO for that consent or clearance, as applicable, before completion of the acquisition. Any agreement for an acquisition must be subject to receiving such consent or clearance.
The applicant is required to provide details of its structure, decision-making processes, how the investment will be funded and controlling individuals. For certain land applications, the applicant must also provide details of the benefits to New Zealand that would result from the investment.
An individual or entity will be considered an overseas person if they are not a New Zealand citizen, not ordinarily a resident of New Zealand or, in the case of an entity, incorporated overseas or more than 25 percent owned or controlled by overseas persons. A New Zealand citizen or entity will also be considered an overseas person if they are investing on behalf of an overseas person.
A consent application includes a filing fee that varies according to the type and complexity of the transaction and whether a national interest assessment is required.
Consent under the OIA is required for a range of acquisitions by overseas persons, including the acquisition of more than a 25 percent ownership or control interest in a target entity, or an increase in an existing interest to or through 50 percent, 75 percent or 100 percent.
Consent is required where the value of the applicable New Zealand assets, or consideration attributable to those assets, exceeds NZD $100 million (or an alternative monetary threshold for investors from certain jurisdictions), or where the target owns or controls, directly or indirectly, an interest in sensitive land. The definition of sensitive land is detailed and requires analysis from qualified advisers.
An overseas person establishing a business in New Zealand must obtain consent if, before commencing business, the expected expenditure incurred in establishing the business exceeds NZD $100 million (US$57.8 million), or the relevant alternative monetary threshold.
Direct acquisition of interests in sensitive land also requires consent, including the acquisition of a leasehold interest of three years or more for residential land and 10 years or more for other sensitive land, together with the acquisition of forestry rights and fishing quotas.
Consent requirements can be triggered for transactions occurring upstream of the New Zealand assets, as well as for direct acquisitions in New Zealand.
Investments in strategically important businesses, where a consent requirement is not already triggered, can, and in some cases must, be notified to the OIO for ministerial clearance. Mandatory notification is required for investments in critical direct suppliers to New Zealand's intelligence or security agencies and businesses involved in military or dual-use technology but is otherwise optional. Non-notified transactions may be reviewed by the minister before or after completion of the investment.
For the three new consent pathways, overseas investors must satisfy the new national interest test. The OIO will undertake the three-stage process described above to determine whether a transaction poses a risk to New Zealand's national interest.
However, for transactions which involve farmland, residential land or fishing quota, overseas investors and controlling individuals are required to meet a bright-line investor test comprising a closed list of character and capability factors.
Parties must wait until the assessment is complete and consent is granted before completing the transaction.
Examples of investor test factors include whether the overseas investor has convictions resulting in imprisonment; corporate fines; prohibitions on being a director, promoter or manager of a company; penalties for tax avoidance or evasion; and unpaid tax of NZD 5 million or more in New Zealand or an equivalent amount in another jurisdiction.
Where the overseas investment involves certain categories of sensitive land, the overseas investor must also satisfy the benefit to New Zealand test. The requirements under the test differ depending on the nature of the land. For example, stricter provisions apply where the land is farmland.
The OIO assesses the benefits delivered by the transaction and considers factors including economic benefits, environmental outcomes, public access, protection of historic heritage and advancement of government policy. The OIO must determine whether the benefit is proportionate to the sensitivity of the land and the nature of the transaction.
A specific test must also be satisfied for investments in residential land, including increased housing, non-residential use or incidental residential use.
A mandatory national interest assessment applies to transactions involving strategically important businesses or those undertaken by foreign government investors. Supported by a cross-government committee, the minister has broad discretion to determine whether to block a transaction on the basis that it is contrary to New Zealand's national interests. The minister may address national security or public order risks by imposing conditions, prohibiting incomplete transactions or requiring disposal if completion has already occurred.
Consent to a transaction is granted with standard conditions prescribed by the OIA and, in many cases, special conditions specific to the transaction. Investors are required to report to the OIO on progress in relation to those conditions. If an overseas investor fails to comply with the conditions, the OIO can require the investment to be sold and, in cases of serious or deliberate breaches, criminal or civil penalties may be sought.
Timeframes under the regulations differ depending on the nature of the application.
The statutory timeframe for a farmland application is 100 working days. By contrast, the initial risk assessment under Stage 1 of the new national interest test is be completed within 15 working days, while stages 2 and 3 have 55 working day timeframes.
These timeframes can be paused or extended by the OIO. They do not create a legal obligation enforceable in a court of law, and there is no recourse for applicants if the specified timeframe is not met.
The 2026 MDL has set out an expectation that the OIO will complete 80 percent of Stage 1 assessments in five working days, and 80 percent of all other consent applications within half the relevant statutory timeframes.
In most circumstances, it is difficult to obtain consent under the OIA in advance of agreeing to a transaction because the consent regime screens specific transactions rather than simply identifying the investor.
It is possible for an investor to apply on a standalone basis to be screened against the investor test. However, this does not remove the need to seek consent for a specific transaction, although it may make that process easier and faster.
Where consent under the OIA is required, or where the investor is required or chooses to make a notification, the transaction should be conditional on receiving the relevant consent or clearance and must not proceed to completion until that consent or clearance is obtained.
Investors should assess early in a transaction process whether consent or notification under the OIA will be required and which tests will apply. In some circumstances, although not most, discussions with the OIO before filing can be helpful to gauge the OIO's reaction to aspects of the transaction.
Significant changes to New Zealand's overseas investment regime have recently come into force. The OIO will be focusing on implementing its new processes and ensuring it is meeting the timeframe expectations set out in the MDL.
The current government views overseas investment as increasingly critical to New Zealand's economy, and attracting overseas investment is important for New Zealand's economic growth. However, 2026 is an election year in New Zealand and it is possible there may be election policies regarding overseas investment.
White & Case means the international legal practice comprising White & Case LLP, a New York State registered limited liability partnership, White & Case LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated under English law and all other affiliated partnerships, companies and entities.
This article is prepared for the general information of interested persons. It is not, and does not attempt to be, comprehensive in nature. Due to the general nature of its content, it should not be regarded as legal advice.
© 2026 White & Case LLP