Canada
The Canadian government continues to scrutinize foreign investments by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from "non-like-minded" countries.
Now in its second decade of publication, White & Case's 2026 Foreign Direct Investment Reviews continue to provide a comprehensive overview of foreign direct investment ("FDI") laws and regulations across jurisdictions worldwide.
In this edition, we offer key datapoints to help inform parties and their advisors as they evaluate the evolving challenges presented by FDI screening requirements in cross-border transactions spanning multiple countries. National security-based FDI regimes continue to proliferate globally, with many jurisdictions adopting broader definitions of investments and the sectors subject to review continuing to expand.
FDI screening regimes are entering a more mature phase, and regulators are developing a more sophisticated approach to detecting and reviewing foreign investments. It is therefore critical to consider applicable FDI requirements as transactions, whether mergers and acquisitions, joint venture agreements, public equity offerings or financial restructurings, are negotiated. A clear understanding of potential challenges, the remedies that may be required for approval and the appropriate allocation of FDI risk can help avoid unwelcome surprises related to timing, deal certainty and the execution of business plans.
With a renewed US commitment to open foreign investment from allied countries, ongoing EU cooperation on FDI screening and evolving geopolitical dynamics, FDI screening will increasingly influence the selection of investors in cross-border transactions. New initiatives by the European Commission may also result in increased coordination among FDI authorities in EU Member States, all of which have adopted their own national FDI regimes by 2026.
We continue to believe that most cross-border transactions will be successfully completed in 2026, but understanding the regulatory and institutional parameters, as well as the evolving risks associated with FDI screening, will be critical to maintaining deal certainty and timing.
The Canadian government continues to scrutinize foreign investments by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from "non-like-minded" countries.
Foreign direct investment ("FDI"), whether undertaken directly or indirectly, is generally allowed without restrictions and without the need to obtain prior authorization from an administrative agency.
The landscape of foreign direct investment ("FDI") in the United States continues to evolve under the Trump administration. With expanded jurisdiction and authorities, mandatory filings applying in certain cases, an enhanced focus on a broad array of national security considerations, further attention and resources dedicated to monitoring, compliance and enforcement, and a substantially increased pursuit of non-notified transactions, the FDI apparatus in the United States is more empowered now than perhaps at any time in its history.
The European Union continues to be a driver of foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening, with coordinated and mandatory enforcement now on the horizon.
The wide scope, low trigger thresholds and broad interpretation of the Austrian Foreign Direct Investment ("FDI") regime require a thorough assessment and proactive planning throughout the mergers and acquisitions ("M&A") process.
The Belgian foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime entered into force in July 2023. Investors and authorities alike are still coming to grips with the regime and the limited guidance available to help parties navigate it.
On July 22, 2025, the Bulgarian Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) screening mechanism entered into effect. According to information provided by the screening authority (the "Screening Council"), during its first two months of operation (September and October 2025), the Screening Council approved 10 screening applications out of 11 filed during that period. The investment in all of the above instances originated from so-called "low-risk" countries, and the applications were cleared within a short time frame. As of January 1, 2026, the Screening Council does not yet have an online register, and at present there is no information about the number of filed or pending applications. There is also no information indicating that any FDI has been prohibited or approved subject to conditions.
Croatia introduced a foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime on November 13, 2025. As of January 1, 2026, the regime is not yet operational but expected to be implemented soon.
The Republic of Cyprus' ("RoC") new Foreign Direct Investment Screening Law (the "FDIS Law") will reshape the investment landscape from April 2, 2026, introducing look-back provisions, a screening remit, internal change trigger points, and relatively low notification thresholds.
The Czech Foreign Investments Screening Act took effect in May 2021, establishing the rights and duties of foreign investors and setting screening requirements for Czech targets.
The scope of the Danish foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime is comprehensive and requires a careful assessment of investments and agreements involving Danish companies.
The relevance of Estonia's foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening mechanism has remained modest since its inception at the end of 2023 but is expected to grow in light of the geopolitical situation, on account of increased activity in the defense sector.
Foreign direct investment ("FDI") deals are generally not blocked in Finland, but the government is able to monitor and, if necessary, restrict foreign investment.
French foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening continues to focus on foreign investments involving medical and biotech activities, food security activities or the treatment, storage and transmission of sensitive data. The nuclear ecosystem is subject to very close scrutiny. Around half of the transactions reviewed every year are subject to conditions or remedies, which is an important French specificity. Recent trends also show a growing number of transactions being reviewed, suggesting a shift toward increased scrutiny of foreign investments in France.
Following numerous amendments over the past years, Germany's foreign direct investment ("FDI") review continued in full swing, with further significant updates expected in the coming years.
Greece's mandatory and suspensory foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime became fully operational on November 11, 2025. Foreign investors must comply with notification requirements and consider review timelines in deal planning.
Hungary's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regimes faced temporary headwinds in 2025, but no lasting regulatory changes ultimately took hold.
Ireland's Screening of Third Country Transactions Act entered into force on January 6, 2025.
Italy's "Golden Power Law" review: Over a decade old, yet continuously expanding its reach.
The Latvian foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime applies to companies of significance to national security, as well as companies owning or possessing critical infrastructure. While the law does not provide a general notification obligation, specific rules establish sectoral FDI regimes for certain corporate mergers and acquisitions ("M&A"), real estate transactions, and gambling companies.
All investments concerning national security are within the scope of review in Lithuania.
Two years after its entry into force, the Luxembourg foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime has reached a solid level of maturity, and its requirements are now well understood by market stakeholders. The year 2025 proved to be particularly active and dynamic for M&A transactions in Luxembourg, notably involving targets in the financial sector, with multiple FDI filings submitted.
Malta's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime regulates specific transactions that must be notified to the authorities and may, in some instances, be subject to screening.
The Middle East continues to welcome foreign investment, subject to licensing approvals and ownership thresholds for certain business sectors or in certain geographical zones.
The Netherlands is set to expand its investment screening regime by extending the general mechanism to more sectors and by introducing additional sector-specific regulations.
Norway's foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime is anchored in the Norwegian Security Act (the "Security Act" or the "Act"), which imposes mandatory filing requirements for transactions involving companies designated as security sensitive. The Act also confers wide discretionary authority on Norwegian authorities to review and intervene in transactions involving non-designated companies where national security interests may be at risk.
In 2025, Poland's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime was made permanent, and responsibility for its enforcement was transferred to the Ministry of Finance and Economy.
In Portugal, transactions involving the acquisition of control over strategic assets by entities residing outside the European Union or the European Economic Area ("EEA") may be subject to foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening.
While far-reaching in its scope, compared with other countries in the European Union, the Romanian foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime is generally perceived as investor-friendly.
The year 2025 was not marked by any major changes in the sphere of regulation of foreign investments in Russia, and the regulator continues to implement the course on strengthening control taken earlier.
The year 2025 continued with the implementation of the course set earlier in 2023 and 2024, with few substantial updates to cybersecurity legislation extending FDI regulation to new fields of business critical for the Slovak Republic.
Since 2020, certain foreign direct investments ("FDI") have been subject to scrutiny in Spain. Additional formalities have since been introduced through developing FDI regulations that entered into force on September 1, 2023. As a result, FDI analysis is becoming increasingly important in the context of investments in Spain.
Entering its third year, Sweden's foreign direct investment ("FDI") Act remains a key consideration in a significant share of transactions involving Swedish companies.
Switzerland is set to introduce its first cross-sector foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime. On December 19, 2025, the Swiss Parliament approved the new FDI Act, Investitionsprüfgesetz, establishing a review mechanism focused on foreign state-controlled investors and security-sensitive sectors. The regime is expected to take effect in 2027 at the earliest.
Sustaining economic stability and building on the strong foreign direct investment ("FDI") momentum of 2025, Türkiye continues to prioritize policies that strengthen its position as an attractive and competitive investment hub.
During September and October 2025, the Ukrainian Parliament introduced an updated foreign investment screening framework, marking a significant step toward strengthening national security controls over inbound investments.
Foreign direct investment ("FDI") is permissible in the United Arab Emirates, subject to applicable licensing and ownership conditions.
Foreign direct investment ("FDI") in the United Kingdom is covered by the National Security and Investment Act ("NSIA") 2021 (which equally applies to UK purchasers), and in 2025 the government continued to update information and guidelines concerning the legislation.
Australia's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime underwent significant changes in 2025, including measures to streamline the process for assessing investment applications. Australia's new mandatory merger clearance regime also commenced January 1, 2026.
China continues to optimize its foreign investment environment by reducing investment restrictions, improving market access, and lowering investment thresholds for listed companies.
The Indian government has liberalized foreign direct investment ("FDI") rules in certain sectors, such as the space sector, in recent years and is laying the groundwork for 100 percent foreign investment in the insurance sector, while maintaining existing restrictions on investments from sensitive jurisdictions. This reflects the government's approach toward foreign investment: welcoming foreign capital where it aligns with India's strategic goals, while continuing to protect core interests.
The Japanese government is expanding the business sectors subject to Japan's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime, which covers not only investment but also voting and other actions, to secure stable supply chains and mitigate the risk of technology leakage and diversion of commercial technologies into military use.
The Republic of Korea ("Korea") is entering a more security-focused era of foreign direct investment ("FDI") regulation, with proposed amendments to the Foreign Investment Promotion Act ("FIPA") and longer screening processes requiring foreign investors to adopt proactive regulatory planning and heightened compliance.
Significant changes to the New Zealand overseas investment regime were passed into law in December 2025 and came into force on 6 March 2026. A number of these changes have made it considerably simpler and faster for overseas investors to acquire certain classes of New Zealand assets.
Taiwan continues to promote foreign direct investment ("FDI") under a two-track screening mechanism for foreign investors and People's Republic of China ("PRC") investors.
Italy's "Golden Power Law" review: Over a decade old, yet continuously expanding its reach.
The Italian foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime is also known as the "Golden Power Law" or the "Golden Power regime" in Italy, as it gives the Italian government "golden," or special, powers to approve or veto FDIs. Since 2012, the Italian government has reviewed all transactions involving Italian companies engaged in strategic activities or holding assets of strategic relevance in certain sectors deemed critical for Italy. In the past five years, FDI control has expanded to further protect Italian strategic assets against potentially predatory transactions.
A Golden Power filing must be made by any company adopting a resolution or taking any action in connection with a strategic company transaction, including asset sales; mergers and demergers; transfer of headquarters outside Italian territory; creation of securities or assignment by way of security of the strategic assets, subject to the Italian State Council ruling mentioned above; or changes to the corporate purpose that would result in a change of ownership, availability, or use of strategic assets, or by the purchaser, jointly with the target company, in connection with the direct or indirect acquisition of an equity or debt interest, or voting rights, in a target company holding strategic assets under the Golden Power Law.
In addition to applying to non-Italian and non-EU persons, the Golden Power Law and the relevant filing obligation may also apply to Italian and EU persons, depending on the relevant strategic business sector and the type of transaction subject to notification and review.
Under the Golden Power Law, FDI clearance is mandatory for any strategic company transaction carried out (A) in the defense and national security sectors by any investor (EU (including any Italian investors) or non-EU), (B) in the energy, transportation, communication, health, agri-food and financial, including credit and insurance, sectors, referred to as "key other sectors," by any EU, including any Italian, investor; and (C) in all other strategic sectors (including the "key other sectors") by any non-EU investor. Each case is subject to defined thresholds.
Clearance is also mandatory for a transaction resulting in the assignment by way of guarantee of strategic assets in any strategic sector, subject to the Italian State Council ruling mentioned above, as well as for the incorporation of a new entity operating in defense or national security. It is also mandatory in any other strategic sector if a non-EU investor holds at least 10 percent of the share capital of the new entity.
Clearance must be sought for the strategic acquisition of an equity interest exceeding certain thresholds, currently 3, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 50 percent, by any investor other than the Italian state or any Italian public or publicly controlled entity for the defense and national security sectors, or a controlling interest by any EU, including Italian, investor for any "key other sector".
Strategic acquisitions involving a controlling interest, or at least 10 percent of the corporate capital or voting rights, and any subsequent acquisition exceeding 15, 20, 25 and 50 percent, as long as the investment value is equal to or exceeds €1 million, by any non-EU investor for any other sector (including any "key other sectors"), or agreements involving the acquisition of, or the provision of services in connection with, 5G technology, must also be cleared.
The implementing decrees of the Golden Power Law set out the strategic businesses and assets falling within the industrial sectors subject to FDI review. However, the scope of "industrial sectors" remains broadly defined.
In the defense and national security sectors, all businesses operating in the sector, or businesses producing dual-use products with annual revenues of at least €300 million, are covered by the law.
In the energy sector, the law covers platforms for the supply of energy and gas; critical infrastructure and real estate connected to the nuclear and oil and gas sectors; and businesses operating in the energy sector with annual revenues of at least €300 million and employing at least 250 workers.
Transactions involving businesses providing essential infrastructure for the safekeeping of the state's well-being and vital functions in the critical infrastructure, transportation, telecommunications, and aerospace sectors are also caught under the Golden Power Law.
Critical technologies in the financial, insurance, and credit sectors, or businesses operating in the financial, insurance, and credit sectors with annual revenues of at least €300 million and employing at least 250 workers, are covered, as are registered media companies.
Within the critical technologies sector, essential technologies for the safekeeping of the state's well-being, vital functions, and economic progress are included, such as artificial intelligence ("AI"), module-to-module communication, cybersecurity, nanotechnologies, biotechnologies, aerospace, and robotics.
The health care and pharmaceuticals sector includes critical health care technologies; businesses operating in this sector with annual revenues of at least €300 million and employing at least 250 workers; or strategic resources for the supply of medicines, medical devices, and other medical equipment, and critical diagnostic technologies.
Other industries covered by the Golden Power Law include the supply of critical inputs (including critical raw materials); agri-food; essential goods and services for the safekeeping of the state's well-being and vital functions, including steel, semiconductors, and so on; strategic supply chain activities; access to sensitive data and essential information for the safekeeping of the state's well-being and vital functions; and all transactions involving 5G technologies.
Filings must occur within 10 days after the execution of a binding agreement, or the adoption of a relevant corporate resolution.
The review period is 45 business days, but, as a matter of practice the authority usually decides within 45 calendar days), or 30 days for filings relating to 5G technologies, during which the transaction cannot be completed and any voting rights with respect to the transaction are frozen until clearance is given. It may be extended only once for a maximum of 10 or 20 additional days if the Italian government requests additional information from the filing person or from a third party. If the review period expires without any response from the Italian government, the notification is deemed tacitly cleared, silenzio assenso.
The review period may be extended twice for a maximum period of 20 additional business days per extension, exclusively with reference to filings relating to 5G technologies.
The review period is suspended for up to 35 days from receipt of the notification if an EU Member State or the European Commission decides to review the transaction until the observations or opinion of the relevant EU Member State or the European Commission have been delivered, unless further extended to receive additional information.
If the Italian government initiates a Golden Power review independently in the absence of a filing, the review period will start from the date the Italian government determines that a breach of the filing obligation has occurred.
In addition, a prenotification or presigning procedure is available, enabling any company to file a voluntary pre-notification based on the information available as of the date of the prefiling. Within 30 days of the prefiling, the government must complete an assessment with one of the following outcomes: out of scope, in which case no filing is due; in scope, in which case a filing is due; or in scope but evident that no special powers will be exercised, in which case no filing is due. If there is no response by the Italian government within the 30-day review period, no tacit clearance mechanism applies, and a full formal notification will have to be filed.
The first step for foreign investors interested in entering into a transaction in relation to any Italian company operating, or arguably operating, in any strategic sector should be an evaluation of whether a filing under the Golden Power Law is required. This analysis should be undertaken as soon as possible and in any event before entering into the transaction, to limit unnecessary costs.
The Golden Power Law operates on a principle of substance over form. It follows that when structuring a transaction, the creation of corporate, fiduciary, or contractual investment structures will not limit the applicability of the Golden Power regime if the ultimate beneficial investor falls within its scope of application. Therefore, it is crucial for foreign investors, including potential passive investors, to consider the risk that, if a transaction falls within the scope of the Golden Power Law, the Italian government could veto, condition, or make material recommendations with respect to the transaction.
Similar considerations apply in the structuring of secured financing transactions involving the creation of a direct or indirect pledge or security over any Italian entity or asset that falls within the scope of application of the Italian Golden Power Law and regulations. Although the above-mentioned Italian State Council ruling, which diverges from the position previously taken by the Italian government, provides helpful guidance, it will be key to (i) ensure that pledge agreements accurately comply with the substantive criteria set out in the Italian State Council ruling, (ii) consider that following an event of default, Italian FDI clearance must be obtained before actually enforcing the pledge, and (iii) adopt a cautious approach when considering pledge transactions involving Italian assets in the defense and national security sector, as the Italian State Council Ruling may be deemed not applicable to that sector. Indeed, the Italian State Council ruling refers to the Golden Power Law provision covering all strategic sectors other than defense and national security sector.
Given the broad and imprecise applicability of the Golden Power Law and its implementing decrees, investors, when the timing of the transaction allows, should consider using the newly introduced prenotification procedure to help reduce uncertainty.
Moreover, the extension of the Golden Power Law to certain intragroup transactions and reorganizations requires investors to take a more cautious approach when assessing whether any such internal transactions could be of strategic relevance.
Before entering into any acquisition agreements, it is key that foreign investors consider the filing, and prefiling, if applicable, timeline. Filing obligation terms, long-stop dates, hell-or-high-water covenants, and regulatory clearance closing conditions in acquisition documentation must take into account the latest timelines and conditions relating to the Golden Power Law, as amended from time to time by the Italian legislature.
Amendments to the Golden Power Law, enacted in recent years, have caused numerous complex interpretational issues, including due to the extremely broad definition of the strategic sectors falling under FDI control.
This has led business actors to proceed with increasingly frequent precautionary filings to the Italian government, resulting in a significant shift in the number of filings over recent years, from approximately 577 known filings, including 150 prefilings, made in 2023 to 835 filings, including 175 prefilings, in 2024, representing an increase of approximately 44.7 percent with respect to the previous year. Of these, intragroup transactions represent 12 percent of total filings.1
While the landmark Italian State Council ruling described above provides welcome clarity and is likely to be well received in the marketplace, it remains to be seen how the Italian FDI authority will react, and the ruling may be deemed not applicable to the defense and national security sector. As a result, investors and lenders must carefully assess financing structures, related security packages, and the approach to be adopted with respect to Italian FDI filings on a case-by-case basis. In this respect, please note that recently, in connection with pledge transactions (regarding companies unrelated to the defense and national security sector) that were filed before, but cleared after, the Italian State Council Ruling, the relevant Italian FDI clearance concluded that the transaction was "out of scope". Finally, banks and financial institutions should take into account the need (and be prepared) to obtain Italian FDI clearance, in order to be able to actually enforce any pledge (including with respect to the transfer of any voting, administrative and/or economic rights).
In addition, more generally, the need to notify an increasing number of transactions, including in connection with intragroup transactions, will likely lead to increased transaction costs for investors and prolonged timeframes for deal completion. In this respect, the new prenotification procedure should be considered a tool to limit uncertainty, provided that the assessment of the possible impacts of the Golden Power Law on the relevant transaction is carried out early in the process.
Finally, as discussed above, in response to the European Commission's challenge, the Italian government on January 15, 2026, finally approved revisions to the Golden Power Law, including deferring domestic review of transactions involving strategic assets in the banking/finance sector until after EU, and European Central Bank ("ECB") assessments, and adding "economic and financial security" among the key national interests protected by the Golden Power Law. As a result, in connection with the structuring of any relevant transaction relating to the finance (banking/credit and insurance) sector, the timetable will need to take into account the interplay of the sector specific regulatory proceedings conducted by the competent European authorities (as described above) with the applicable Golden Power Law.
1 These statistical data are based on the official data set out in the latest Italian government Golden Power report to the Parliament published in 2025 and relating to the year 2024. The official data relating to the year 2025 will become available later in 2026 (generally around June), upon publication of the Italian government Golden Power report for the year 2025. Based on publicly available information, the non-official estimated number of notifications in 2025 amounts to a total of more than 800 notifications, with special powers applied only to a limited number of transactions, substantially in line with 2024.
White & Case means the international legal practice comprising White & Case LLP, a New York State registered limited liability partnership, White & Case LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated under English law and all other affiliated partnerships, companies and entities.
This article is prepared for the general information of interested persons. It is not, and does not attempt to be, comprehensive in nature. Due to the general nature of its content, it should not be regarded as legal advice.
© 2026 White & Case LLP