Our thinking

Foreign direct investment reviews 2026: A global perspective

What's inside

As regulatory scrutiny intensifies and geopolitical tensions reshape cross-border investment, understanding the evolving global foreign direct investment landscape has become increasingly important.

Introduction

Now in its second decade of publication, White & Case's 2026 Foreign Direct Investment Reviews continue to provide a comprehensive overview of foreign direct investment ("FDI") laws and regulations across jurisdictions worldwide.

In this edition, we offer key datapoints to help inform parties and their advisors as they evaluate the evolving challenges presented by FDI screening requirements in cross-border transactions spanning multiple countries. National security-based FDI regimes continue to proliferate globally, with many jurisdictions adopting broader definitions of investments and the sectors subject to review continuing to expand.

FDI screening regimes are entering a more mature phase, and regulators are developing a more sophisticated approach to detecting and reviewing foreign investments. It is therefore critical to consider applicable FDI requirements as transactions, whether mergers and acquisitions, joint venture agreements, public equity offerings or financial restructurings, are negotiated. A clear understanding of potential challenges, the remedies that may be required for approval and the appropriate allocation of FDI risk can help avoid unwelcome surprises related to timing, deal certainty and the execution of business plans.

With a renewed US commitment to open foreign investment from allied countries, ongoing EU cooperation on FDI screening and evolving geopolitical dynamics, FDI screening will increasingly influence the selection of investors in cross-border transactions. New initiatives by the European Commission may also result in increased coordination among FDI authorities in EU Member States, all of which have adopted their own national FDI regimes by 2026.

We continue to believe that most cross-border transactions will be successfully completed in 2026, but understanding the regulatory and institutional parameters, as well as the evolving risks associated with FDI screening, will be critical to maintaining deal certainty and timing.

Americas

Canada

The Canadian government continues to scrutinize foreign investments by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from "non-like-minded" countries.

canada fdi 2022

Mexico

Foreign direct investment ("FDI"), whether undertaken directly or indirectly, is generally allowed without restrictions and without the need to obtain prior authorization from an administrative agency.

mexico fdi 2022

United States

The landscape of foreign direct investment ("FDI") in the United States continues to evolve under the Trump administration. With expanded jurisdiction and authorities, mandatory filings applying in certain cases, an enhanced focus on a broad array of national security considerations, further attention and resources dedicated to monitoring, compliance and enforcement, and a substantially increased pursuit of non-notified transactions, the FDI apparatus in the United States is more empowered now than perhaps at any time in its history.

United States

EMEA

European Union

The European Union continues to be a driver of foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening, with coordinated and mandatory enforcement now on the horizon.

european union fdi 2022

Austria

The wide scope, low trigger thresholds and broad interpretation of the Austrian Foreign Direct Investment ("FDI") regime require a thorough assessment and proactive planning throughout the mergers and acquisitions ("M&A") process.

austria fdi 2022

Belgium

The Belgian foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime entered into force in July 2023. Investors and authorities alike are still coming to grips with the regime and the limited guidance available to help parties navigate it.

Belgium

Bulgaria

On July 22, 2025, the Bulgarian Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) screening mechanism entered into effect. According to information provided by the screening authority (the "Screening Council"), during its first two months of operation (September and October 2025), the Screening Council approved 10 screening applications out of 11 filed during that period. The investment in all of the above instances originated from so-called "low-risk" countries, and the applications were cleared within a short time frame. As of January 1, 2026, the Screening Council does not yet have an online register, and at present there is no information about the number of filed or pending applications. There is also no information indicating that any FDI has been prohibited or approved subject to conditions.

Bulgaria

Croatia

Croatia introduced a foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime on November 13, 2025. As of January 1, 2026, the regime is not yet operational but expected to be implemented soon.

Croatia

Republic of Cyprus

The Republic of Cyprus' ("RoC") new Foreign Direct Investment Screening Law (the "FDIS Law") will reshape the investment landscape from April 2, 2026, introducing look-back provisions, a screening remit, internal change trigger points, and relatively low notification thresholds.

Cyprus

Czech Republic

The Czech Foreign Investments Screening Act took effect in May 2021, establishing the rights and duties of foreign investors and setting screening requirements for Czech targets.

czech republic fdi 2022

Denmark

The scope of the Danish foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime is comprehensive and requires a careful assessment of investments and agreements involving Danish companies.

Denmark

Estonia

The relevance of Estonia's foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening mechanism has remained modest since its inception at the end of 2023 but is expected to grow in light of the geopolitical situation, on account of increased activity in the defense sector.

estonia fdi 2022

Finland

Foreign direct investment ("FDI") deals are generally not blocked in Finland, but the government is able to monitor and, if necessary, restrict foreign investment.

10_finland_square_800x800_0.jpg

France

French foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening continues to focus on foreign investments involving medical and biotech activities, food security activities or the treatment, storage and transmission of sensitive data. The nuclear ecosystem is subject to very close scrutiny. Around half of the transactions reviewed every year are subject to conditions or remedies, which is an important French specificity. Recent trends also show a growing number of transactions being reviewed, suggesting a shift toward increased scrutiny of foreign investments in France.

france fdi 2022

Germany

Following numerous amendments over the past years, Germany's foreign direct investment ("FDI") review continued in full swing, with further significant updates expected in the coming years.

Germany

Greece

Greece's mandatory and suspensory foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime became fully operational on November 11, 2025. Foreign investors must comply with notification requirements and consider review timelines in deal planning.

Greece

Hungary

Hungary's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regimes faced temporary headwinds in 2025, but no lasting regulatory changes ultimately took hold.

hungary fdi 2022

Ireland

Ireland's Screening of Third Country Transactions Act entered into force on January 6, 2025.

Ireland

Italy

Italy's "Golden Power Law" review: Over a decade old, yet continuously expanding its reach.

Italy

Latvia

The Latvian foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime applies to companies of significance to national security, as well as companies owning or possessing critical infrastructure. While the law does not provide a general notification obligation, specific rules establish sectoral FDI regimes for certain corporate mergers and acquisitions ("M&A"), real estate transactions, and gambling companies.

Latvia

Lithuania

All investments concerning national security are within the scope of review in Lithuania.

Lithuania

Luxembourg

Two years after its entry into force, the Luxembourg foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime has reached a solid level of maturity, and its requirements are now well understood by market stakeholders. The year 2025 proved to be particularly active and dynamic for M&A transactions in Luxembourg, notably involving targets in the financial sector, with multiple FDI filings submitted.

Luxembourg

Malta

Malta's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime regulates specific transactions that must be notified to the authorities and may, in some instances, be subject to screening.

Malta

Middle East

The Middle East continues to welcome foreign investment, subject to licensing approvals and ownership thresholds for certain business sectors or in certain geographical zones.

Middle East

Netherlands

The Netherlands is set to expand its investment screening regime by extending the general mechanism to more sectors and by introducing additional sector-specific regulations.

Netherlands

Norway

Norway's foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime is anchored in the Norwegian Security Act (the "Security Act" or the "Act"), which imposes mandatory filing requirements for transactions involving companies designated as security sensitive. The Act also confers wide discretionary authority on Norwegian authorities to review and intervene in transactions involving non-designated companies where national security interests may be at risk.

Norway

Poland

In 2025, Poland's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime was made permanent, and responsibility for its enforcement was transferred to the Ministry of Finance and Economy.

Poland

Portugal

In Portugal, transactions involving the acquisition of control over strategic assets by entities residing outside the European Union or the European Economic Area ("EEA") may be subject to foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening.

Portugal

Romania

While far-reaching in its scope, compared with other countries in the European Union, the Romanian foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime is generally perceived as investor-friendly.

Romania

Russian Federation

The year 2025 was not marked by any major changes in the sphere of regulation of foreign investments in Russia, and the regulator continues to implement the course on strengthening control taken earlier.

Russian Federation

Slovakia

The year 2025 continued with the implementation of the course set earlier in 2023 and 2024, with few substantial updates to cybersecurity legislation extending FDI regulation to new fields of business critical for the Slovak Republic.

Slovakia

Spain

Since 2020, certain foreign direct investments ("FDI") have been subject to scrutiny in Spain. Additional formalities have since been introduced through developing FDI regulations that entered into force on September 1, 2023. As a result, FDI analysis is becoming increasingly important in the context of investments in Spain.

Spain

Sweden

Entering its third year, Sweden's foreign direct investment ("FDI") Act remains a key consideration in a significant share of transactions involving Swedish companies.

Sweden

Switzerland

Switzerland is set to introduce its first cross-sector foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime. On December 19, 2025, the Swiss Parliament approved the new FDI Act, Investitionsprüfgesetz, establishing a review mechanism focused on foreign state-controlled investors and security-sensitive sectors. The regime is expected to take effect in 2027 at the earliest.

Switzerland

Türkiye

Sustaining economic stability and building on the strong foreign direct investment ("FDI") momentum of 2025, Türkiye continues to prioritize policies that strengthen its position as an attractive and competitive investment hub.

Turkiye

Ukraine

During September and October 2025, the Ukrainian Parliament introduced an updated foreign investment screening framework, marking a significant step toward strengthening national security controls over inbound investments.

Ukraine

United Arab Emirates

Foreign direct investment ("FDI") is permissible in the United Arab Emirates, subject to applicable licensing and ownership conditions.

UAE

United Kingdom

Foreign direct investment ("FDI") in the United Kingdom is covered by the National Security and Investment Act ("NSIA") 2021 (which equally applies to UK purchasers), and in 2025 the government continued to update information and guidelines concerning the legislation.

United Kingdom

Asia-Pacific

Australia

Australia's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime underwent significant changes in 2025, including measures to streamline the process for assessing investment applications. Australia's new mandatory merger clearance regime also commenced January 1, 2026.

Australia

China

China continues to optimize its foreign investment environment by reducing investment restrictions, improving market access, and lowering investment thresholds for listed companies.

China

India

The Indian government has liberalized foreign direct investment ("FDI") rules in certain sectors, such as the space sector, in recent years and is laying the groundwork for 100 percent foreign investment in the insurance sector, while maintaining existing restrictions on investments from sensitive jurisdictions. This reflects the government's approach toward foreign investment: welcoming foreign capital where it aligns with India's strategic goals, while continuing to protect core interests.

India

Japan

The Japanese government is expanding the business sectors subject to Japan's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime, which covers not only investment but also voting and other actions, to secure stable supply chains and mitigate the risk of technology leakage and diversion of commercial technologies into military use.

Japan

Republic of Korea

The Republic of Korea ("Korea") is entering a more security-focused era of foreign direct investment ("FDI") regulation, with proposed amendments to the Foreign Investment Promotion Act ("FIPA") and longer screening processes requiring foreign investors to adopt proactive regulatory planning and heightened compliance.

Korea

New Zealand

Significant changes to the New Zealand overseas investment regime were passed into law in December 2025 and came into force on 6 March 2026. A number of these changes have made it considerably simpler and faster for overseas investors to acquire certain classes of New Zealand assets.

New Zealand

Taiwan

Taiwan continues to promote foreign direct investment ("FDI") under a two-track screening mechanism for foreign investors and People's Republic of China ("PRC") investors.

Taiwan
Russian Federation

Foreign direct investment reviews 2026: Russian Federation

The year 2025 was not marked by any major changes in the sphere of regulation of foreign investments in Russia, and the regulator continues to implement the course on strengthening control taken earlier.

Insight
|
10 min read

Ksenia Tyunik (External Counsel) co-authored this publication

Introduction

Established by the Russian government in 2008, the Government Commission on Control over Foreign Investments in the Russian Federation (the "Government Commission"), headed by the chairman of the Russian government, is responsible for the review of foreign direct investment ("FDI") applications.

Although the final decision on the application is made by the Government Commission, all preparatory work, such as receiving applications, reviewing their completeness and liaising with relevant government bodies to obtain opinions on planned transactions, is carried out by the Federal Antimonopoly Service ("FAS"), which is also responsible for developing law enforcement practice in this area.

Summary of major changes in 2025

Russian laws on foreign investments were not substantially amended in 2025. FAS continues to implement amendments adopted earlier. The trend of invalidating transactions by foreign investors involving Russian strategic companies and freezing the respective stakes in such companies for the benefit of the Russian Federation continues.

The past year was marked by several significant court proceedings, which resulted in the transfer of shares in major Russian holdings to the state as a measure for alleged violations of Russian FDI regulations. Notably, in such cases FAS is increasingly developing a complex and comprehensive position regarding the establishment of control, including its "hidden" forms. In several cases, control was established on the basis of a combination of circumstantial evidence, which included not only legal but also factual circumstances.

The work of the Government Commission has become more closed in recent years. In particular, information on the dates of its meetings and agenda is no longer publicly available.

Who files?

The application for FDI approval is filed by the acquirer in a transaction resulting in the acquisition of control over an entity engaged in activities of strategic importance to Russian national defense and security, referred to as a "strategic entity." The acquirer is required to obtain the consent of the Government Commission prior to the acquisition of control over a strategic entity, otherwise the transaction is declared void.

If an acquirer is a foreign state-owned company, it must submit an application for approval with respect to the acquisition of any Russian company, not necessarily a strategic entity, if it obtains, directly or indirectly, a blocking stake in, or veto rights in relation to, such a company. These applications with respect to Russian companies not engaged in activities of strategic importance are generally subject to simplified review by FAS only, unless the regulator invokes the right of the prime minister to decide that a full-scale FDI review by the Government Commission is required.

To apply for consent, the acquirer must submit an application to FAS with attachments including corporate charter documents of the acquirer and the target, information on their groups' structures including the entire chain of control over both the acquirer and the target, transaction documents, and a business plan for the development of the target after closing. A table disclosing the acquirer's ultimate controlling entities, beneficiaries and beneficial owners is also required.

Types of deals reviewed

The Government Commission reviews transactions that result in the acquisition of control over strategic entities. Foreign investors must also obtain the Government Commission's consent for certain transactions involving the acquisition of a strategic entity's property, as well as for establishing control over entities that apply for a "strategic" license or accreditation or obtain the right to fishing.

The list of activities of strategic importance comprises 51 activities that, if engaged in by the target, cause the target to be considered a strategic entity. The activities include not only those directly related to state defense and security, such as operations with nuclear materials and the production of weapons and military machines, but also certain indirectly related activities, such as television and radio broadcasting over certain territories, fishing activities and publishing activities.

The criteria for determining control are broad and are lower, at 25 percent, for a target involved in the exploration of subsoil blocks of federal importance, such as oil fields with a certain size of reserves, uranium mines and subsoil blocks subject to exploration within a defense and security zone, or for entities engaged in fishing activities.

Foreign public investors are prohibited from obtaining control over strategic entities or acquiring more than 25 percent of a strategic entity's property, and must obtain consent from the Government Commission for acquisitions of lower stakes in strategic entities or acquisition of blocking rights with respect to the activities of such entities.

Such investors, however, may acquire control, defined as 25 percent or more of shares, over a strategic entity involved in exploration of subsoil blocks of federal importance or engaged in fishing activities if this does not change the existing control over such entities by the Russian Federation where it has a stake exceeding 50 percent. These acquisitions must be specifically approved by the Government Commission.

Investors refusing to disclose information about their beneficiaries, beneficial owners and controlling persons to FAS are subject to a special, stricter regime established for foreign public investors. According to the rules for disclosing this information approved by the government, a foreign investor planning to enter into a transaction involving a strategic entity must make prior disclosure of its controlling entities, beneficiaries and beneficial owners in order to avoid being treated as a non-disclosing investor and to ensure that the stricter regime established for foreign public investors will not apply. The disclosure must be made either in the form of an application for approval, if approval is required, or in the form of an informational letter filed with FAS 30 days before the transaction.

The chairman of the Government Commission, the prime minister, has the right to decide that prior approval is required with respect to any transaction by any foreign investor involving any Russian company, not necessarily a strategic entity, if this is needed to ensure national defense and state security. The process is initiated by FAS, which obtains opinions from the Ministry of Defense, the Federal Security Service and other governing bodies on whether the transaction should be sent to the chairman for his decision.

If at least one positive response is received, FAS sends materials to the prime minister for review and adoption of a decision. Upon receipt of a positive decision, FAS notifies the foreign investor of the need to obtain approval for a prospective transaction. Any transaction made in breach of this requirement is void.

The process is mandatory for transactions with targets participating in a national project, operating a city-forming enterprise, enjoying a dominant position in any market, or being the sole producer of products or services not under the control of a foreign investor, among others. In practice, FAS also invokes this right if the target operates in certain sensitive areas of state policy and the economy, in particular involving certain critical technologies such as genetic engineering, nanodevices, or cryobiology and biomaterial conservation.

Scope of the review

  • Generally, a review of an FDI application assesses the transaction's impact on state defense and security.
  • FAS initially requests opinions from the Ministry of Defense and the Federal Security Service on whether the transaction poses any threat to Russian defense and security. Additionally, if the target has a license for dealing with information constituting state secrets, FAS requests information from the Interagency Committee for the State Secrecy Protection regarding the existence of an international treaty allowing a foreign investor to access information constituting state secrets.
  • Russian law does not provide additional details on the scope of the review or the criteria used to assess the transaction under review.

Review process timeline

The statutory period for reviewing the application is three months from the date of its acceptance for review. The Government Commission may extend the review period for an additional three months. In practice, the Commission uses this extension right for a large portion of applications pending review, and review timing largely depends on the availability of the Commission's members and the prime minister, meaning it may take longer than the statutory timeline.

The law sets out a simplified procedure for reviewing transactions in which a target engages in strategic activities but operates in certain civil sectors, such as the use of infectious disease agents in the food industry and water supply and drainage using centralized and municipal infrastructure, but where, due to the specifics of the activities, its "strategic" assets account for no more than 1 percent of its total assets.

For such transactions, approval is generally issued by FAS itself unless negative opinions or no opinions are received from the Ministry of Defense and the Federal Security Service, with subsequent notification of the Government Commission of the decision.

Applications by foreign state-owned companies filed with respect to non-strategic entities are reviewed under the simplified procedure by FAS only and approvals are therefore generally issued relatively quickly, unless FAS decides to invoke the right of the prime minister.

Public information on the activities of the Government Commission has become very limited in recent years, and therefore the percentage of approvals issued with respect to transactions submitted to the Government Commission for review is unclear. If approval is issued, it confirms the time period within which the acquisition must be completed. The acquirer may subsequently apply to the Government Commission with a substantiated request to extend this period if necessary.

The Government Commission may approve the transaction subject to certain obligations imposed on the foreign investor. The law contains certain lists of obligations that are not exhaustive, and the Government Commission has the right to impose any type of obligation on the foreign investor. These obligations may include requirements to invest certain amounts of funds in the activities of the strategic entity, to process bioresources or natural resources extracted by the strategic entity on Russian territory, to sell the strategic entity's products at fixed prices, to continue investment programs, or to localize the production of parts, components and accessories used by strategic entities in the production of goods.

How foreign investors can protect themselves

Early in a transaction, a foreign investor should analyze whether the target company qualifies as a strategic entity and whether the planned transaction triggers a requirement for the Government Commission's consent. It is also necessary to analyze whether such consent would be required if the acquirer is classified as a non-disclosing investor. Answering these questions will allow the investor to begin filing preparations and submit its application sufficiently in advance to manage the impact of the filing on the timing of the transaction.

If the planned transaction does not require prior consent but consent would be required if the acquirer is classified as a non-disclosing investor, the acquirer must disclose to FAS information on the acquirer's beneficiaries, beneficial owners and controlling persons in advance, at least 30 days before the planned transaction.

Even if the target company does not qualify as a strategic entity, the investor should analyze whether it operates in sectors for which invoking the right of the prime minister is mandatory, or in other potentially sensitive sectors, including those affected by sanctions or counter-sanctions, or possesses any critical technologies that may trigger referral of the transaction by FAS to the prime minister and result in a full-scale FDI review of the transaction.

Finally, a foreign public investor intending to acquire a stake exceeding 25 percent of shares in any Russian company, or blocking rights with respect to such company, must obtain FAS clearance for such acquisitions.

Looking ahead: Likely developments in the next year

At the beginning of 2025, FAS submitted for public review a package of significant amendments to Russia's FDI regulations. Some of these amendments have already been adopted: the relevant federal law was passed on March 8, 2026, and, in its main point, will enter into force on June 7, 2026. The key changes include:

  • Expansion of the concept of a "strategic entity" to include entities that formally hold a license or other authorization to engage in "strategic" activities, regardless of whether they actually conduct such activities.
  • Introduction of the concept of subsoil blocks of non-federal significance, together with criteria for the volume of mineral resources in such blocks. Entities operating these blocks are considered "strategic," but they are not subject to certain stricter requirements applicable to users of subsoil blocks of federal significance, such as lower control thresholds or prohibitions on foreign public investors.
  • Introduction of the new types of "strategic" activities in the fishing sector, including fish farming and the production of fish products.

The FAS continues to work on additional amendments to the FDI regime, and further legislative developments may be proposed and adopted in 2026.

White & Case means the international legal practice comprising White & Case LLP, a New York State registered limited liability partnership, White & Case LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated under English law and all other affiliated partnerships, companies and entities.

This article is prepared for the general information of interested persons. It is not, and does not attempt to be, comprehensive in nature. Due to the general nature of its content, it should not be regarded as legal advice.

© 2026 White & Case LLP

Top