Canada
The Canadian government continues to scrutinize foreign investments by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from "non-like-minded" countries.
Now in its second decade of publication, White & Case's 2026 Foreign Direct Investment Reviews continue to provide a comprehensive overview of foreign direct investment ("FDI") laws and regulations across jurisdictions worldwide.
In this edition, we offer key datapoints to help inform parties and their advisors as they evaluate the evolving challenges presented by FDI screening requirements in cross-border transactions spanning multiple countries. National security-based FDI regimes continue to proliferate globally, with many jurisdictions adopting broader definitions of investments and the sectors subject to review continuing to expand.
FDI screening regimes are entering a more mature phase, and regulators are developing a more sophisticated approach to detecting and reviewing foreign investments. It is therefore critical to consider applicable FDI requirements as transactions, whether mergers and acquisitions, joint venture agreements, public equity offerings or financial restructurings, are negotiated. A clear understanding of potential challenges, the remedies that may be required for approval and the appropriate allocation of FDI risk can help avoid unwelcome surprises related to timing, deal certainty and the execution of business plans.
With a renewed US commitment to open foreign investment from allied countries, ongoing EU cooperation on FDI screening and evolving geopolitical dynamics, FDI screening will increasingly influence the selection of investors in cross-border transactions. New initiatives by the European Commission may also result in increased coordination among FDI authorities in EU Member States, all of which have adopted their own national FDI regimes by 2026.
We continue to believe that most cross-border transactions will be successfully completed in 2026, but understanding the regulatory and institutional parameters, as well as the evolving risks associated with FDI screening, will be critical to maintaining deal certainty and timing.
The Canadian government continues to scrutinize foreign investments by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from "non-like-minded" countries.
Foreign direct investment ("FDI"), whether undertaken directly or indirectly, is generally allowed without restrictions and without the need to obtain prior authorization from an administrative agency.
The landscape of foreign direct investment ("FDI") in the United States continues to evolve under the Trump administration. With expanded jurisdiction and authorities, mandatory filings applying in certain cases, an enhanced focus on a broad array of national security considerations, further attention and resources dedicated to monitoring, compliance and enforcement, and a substantially increased pursuit of non-notified transactions, the FDI apparatus in the United States is more empowered now than perhaps at any time in its history.
The European Union continues to be a driver of foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening, with coordinated and mandatory enforcement now on the horizon.
The wide scope, low trigger thresholds and broad interpretation of the Austrian Foreign Direct Investment ("FDI") regime require a thorough assessment and proactive planning throughout the mergers and acquisitions ("M&A") process.
The Belgian foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime entered into force in July 2023. Investors and authorities alike are still coming to grips with the regime and the limited guidance available to help parties navigate it.
On July 22, 2025, the Bulgarian Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) screening mechanism entered into effect. According to information provided by the screening authority (the "Screening Council"), during its first two months of operation (September and October 2025), the Screening Council approved 10 screening applications out of 11 filed during that period. The investment in all of the above instances originated from so-called "low-risk" countries, and the applications were cleared within a short time frame. As of January 1, 2026, the Screening Council does not yet have an online register, and at present there is no information about the number of filed or pending applications. There is also no information indicating that any FDI has been prohibited or approved subject to conditions.
Croatia introduced a foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime on November 13, 2025. As of January 1, 2026, the regime is not yet operational but expected to be implemented soon.
The Republic of Cyprus' ("RoC") new Foreign Direct Investment Screening Law (the "FDIS Law") will reshape the investment landscape from April 2, 2026, introducing look-back provisions, a screening remit, internal change trigger points, and relatively low notification thresholds.
The Czech Foreign Investments Screening Act took effect in May 2021, establishing the rights and duties of foreign investors and setting screening requirements for Czech targets.
The scope of the Danish foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime is comprehensive and requires a careful assessment of investments and agreements involving Danish companies.
The relevance of Estonia's foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening mechanism has remained modest since its inception at the end of 2023 but is expected to grow in light of the geopolitical situation, on account of increased activity in the defense sector.
Foreign direct investment ("FDI") deals are generally not blocked in Finland, but the government is able to monitor and, if necessary, restrict foreign investment.
French foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening continues to focus on foreign investments involving medical and biotech activities, food security activities or the treatment, storage and transmission of sensitive data. The nuclear ecosystem is subject to very close scrutiny. Around half of the transactions reviewed every year are subject to conditions or remedies, which is an important French specificity. Recent trends also show a growing number of transactions being reviewed, suggesting a shift toward increased scrutiny of foreign investments in France.
Following numerous amendments over the past years, Germany's foreign direct investment ("FDI") review continued in full swing, with further significant updates expected in the coming years.
Greece's mandatory and suspensory foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime became fully operational on November 11, 2025. Foreign investors must comply with notification requirements and consider review timelines in deal planning.
Hungary's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regimes faced temporary headwinds in 2025, but no lasting regulatory changes ultimately took hold.
Ireland's Screening of Third Country Transactions Act entered into force on January 6, 2025.
Italy's "Golden Power Law" review: Over a decade old, yet continuously expanding its reach.
The Latvian foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime applies to companies of significance to national security, as well as companies owning or possessing critical infrastructure. While the law does not provide a general notification obligation, specific rules establish sectoral FDI regimes for certain corporate mergers and acquisitions ("M&A"), real estate transactions, and gambling companies.
All investments concerning national security are within the scope of review in Lithuania.
Two years after its entry into force, the Luxembourg foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime has reached a solid level of maturity, and its requirements are now well understood by market stakeholders. The year 2025 proved to be particularly active and dynamic for M&A transactions in Luxembourg, notably involving targets in the financial sector, with multiple FDI filings submitted.
Malta's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime regulates specific transactions that must be notified to the authorities and may, in some instances, be subject to screening.
The Middle East continues to welcome foreign investment, subject to licensing approvals and ownership thresholds for certain business sectors or in certain geographical zones.
The Netherlands is set to expand its investment screening regime by extending the general mechanism to more sectors and by introducing additional sector-specific regulations.
Norway's foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime is anchored in the Norwegian Security Act (the "Security Act" or the "Act"), which imposes mandatory filing requirements for transactions involving companies designated as security sensitive. The Act also confers wide discretionary authority on Norwegian authorities to review and intervene in transactions involving non-designated companies where national security interests may be at risk.
In 2025, Poland's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime was made permanent, and responsibility for its enforcement was transferred to the Ministry of Finance and Economy.
In Portugal, transactions involving the acquisition of control over strategic assets by entities residing outside the European Union or the European Economic Area ("EEA") may be subject to foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening.
While far-reaching in its scope, compared with other countries in the European Union, the Romanian foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime is generally perceived as investor-friendly.
The year 2025 was not marked by any major changes in the sphere of regulation of foreign investments in Russia, and the regulator continues to implement the course on strengthening control taken earlier.
The year 2025 continued with the implementation of the course set earlier in 2023 and 2024, with few substantial updates to cybersecurity legislation extending FDI regulation to new fields of business critical for the Slovak Republic.
Since 2020, certain foreign direct investments ("FDI") have been subject to scrutiny in Spain. Additional formalities have since been introduced through developing FDI regulations that entered into force on September 1, 2023. As a result, FDI analysis is becoming increasingly important in the context of investments in Spain.
Entering its third year, Sweden's foreign direct investment ("FDI") Act remains a key consideration in a significant share of transactions involving Swedish companies.
Switzerland is set to introduce its first cross-sector foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime. On December 19, 2025, the Swiss Parliament approved the new FDI Act, Investitionsprüfgesetz, establishing a review mechanism focused on foreign state-controlled investors and security-sensitive sectors. The regime is expected to take effect in 2027 at the earliest.
Sustaining economic stability and building on the strong foreign direct investment ("FDI") momentum of 2025, Türkiye continues to prioritize policies that strengthen its position as an attractive and competitive investment hub.
During September and October 2025, the Ukrainian Parliament introduced an updated foreign investment screening framework, marking a significant step toward strengthening national security controls over inbound investments.
Foreign direct investment ("FDI") is permissible in the United Arab Emirates, subject to applicable licensing and ownership conditions.
Foreign direct investment ("FDI") in the United Kingdom is covered by the National Security and Investment Act ("NSIA") 2021 (which equally applies to UK purchasers), and in 2025 the government continued to update information and guidelines concerning the legislation.
Australia's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime underwent significant changes in 2025, including measures to streamline the process for assessing investment applications. Australia's new mandatory merger clearance regime also commenced January 1, 2026.
China continues to optimize its foreign investment environment by reducing investment restrictions, improving market access, and lowering investment thresholds for listed companies.
The Indian government has liberalized foreign direct investment ("FDI") rules in certain sectors, such as the space sector, in recent years and is laying the groundwork for 100 percent foreign investment in the insurance sector, while maintaining existing restrictions on investments from sensitive jurisdictions. This reflects the government's approach toward foreign investment: welcoming foreign capital where it aligns with India's strategic goals, while continuing to protect core interests.
The Japanese government is expanding the business sectors subject to Japan's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime, which covers not only investment but also voting and other actions, to secure stable supply chains and mitigate the risk of technology leakage and diversion of commercial technologies into military use.
The Republic of Korea ("Korea") is entering a more security-focused era of foreign direct investment ("FDI") regulation, with proposed amendments to the Foreign Investment Promotion Act ("FIPA") and longer screening processes requiring foreign investors to adopt proactive regulatory planning and heightened compliance.
Significant changes to the New Zealand overseas investment regime were passed into law in December 2025 and came into force on 6 March 2026. A number of these changes have made it considerably simpler and faster for overseas investors to acquire certain classes of New Zealand assets.
Taiwan continues to promote foreign direct investment ("FDI") under a two-track screening mechanism for foreign investors and People's Republic of China ("PRC") investors.
The year 2025 continued with the implementation of the course set earlier in 2023 and 2024, with few substantial updates to cybersecurity legislation extending FDI regulation to new fields of business critical for the Slovak Republic.
David Kunák (White & Case) co-authored this publication
In Slovakia, foreign investments are regulated by Act No. 497/2022 Coll., on the Screening of Foreign Investments, as amended (the "FDI Act"), which provides a comprehensive framework for foreign investment screening in Slovakia.
As outlined in the explanatory memorandum to the FDI Act, its main objective is to provide safeguards and ensure the preservation of domestic and European Union ("EU") security and public order while encouraging responsible foreign investment, with no intention of restricting foreign investment in Slovakia.
The Ministry of Economy of the Slovak Republic ("Ministry") issues an annual summary report on the application of the FDI Act each June, covering detailed statistics for the preceding calendar year. Although the summary report for 2025 has not yet been published, there are no indications suggesting any substantial changes compared with the 2024 statistics.
Under the FDI Act, foreign investors, including legal entities having their registered seat outside the EU and individuals who are not EU citizens, are responsible for submitting applications for screening to the Ministry.
Furthermore, under the FDI Act, EU citizens as well as legal entities with their registered seat within the EU are also considered foreign investors, and therefore responsible for filing, if they are controlled by or receive funding from a non-EU government, or if they are controlled by an entity from a third country outside the EU.
Foreign investors are responsible for submitting an application for screening to the Ministry if their intended investment falls within the definition of foreign investment under the FDI Act.
Foreign investment includes any investment, regardless of the applicability of Slovak laws, as long as it directly or indirectly enables the foreign investor to acquire a Slovak target or key assets of a Slovak target; acquire effective participation, defined as voting rights or registered capital, in a Slovak target (10 percent in a critical foreign investment and 25 percent in a non-critical foreign investment); increase effective participation in a Slovak target (to 20 percent, 33 percent or 50 percent in the case of a critical foreign investment, and to 50 percent in the case of a non-critical foreign investment); or exercise control over a Slovak target.
The FDI Act distinguishes between critical foreign investments ("CFIs") and non-critical foreign investments ("NCFIs"), each subject to a different screening regime.
CFIs include transactions where the target companies operate in specific sensitive sectors such as firearms manufacturing; entities active in military technology or materials research, development or innovation; dual-use item manufacturing or research, development or innovation involving dual-use items; biotechnology; critical infrastructure operators or operators designated as critical by the Slovak government; operators of essential services under the Slovak Cybersecurity Act; digital service providers; and providers of content-sharing platforms with an annual turnover exceeding €2 million.
Completion of a CFI is subject to approval or conditional approval from the Ministry. Therefore, mandatory pre-closing screening is required for all CFIs.
Although NCFIs are not subject to mandatory pre-closing screening, foreign investors are encouraged to voluntarily request an assessment by the Ministry before completing their investment for the sake of legal certainty.
Although no such proceedings appear to have been initiated yet, the Slovak government reserves the right to initiate ex officio proceedings regarding any foreign investment within two years after completion if there is a reasonable belief that the foreign investment had a negative impact when completed.
In 2024, the Slovak Parliament passed a new amendment to the Slovak Cybersecurity Act (Act No. 69/2018 Coll., as amended) implementing the NIS 2 Directive and substantially extending the category of operators of essential services. The amendment has direct implications for the FDI Act, as operators of essential services are considered critical from the FDI perspective and any foreign investment in such Slovak target companies may be considered a CFI subject to mandatory pre-closing FDI screening and approval if statutory thresholds are met.
The expanded category of operators of essential services also includes medium-sized enterprises with fewer than 250 employees and an annual turnover not exceeding €50 million operating, among others, in the following sectors: (i) manufacture of motor vehicles, trailers and semi-trailers; (ii) manufacture of electrical equipment; (iii) manufacture of machinery and equipment; (iv) waste management; (v) manufacture, production and distribution of chemicals; and (vi) production, processing and distribution of food.
The amendment requires companies performing activities in critical sectors to notify the Slovak cybersecurity authority, the National Security Authority ("NSA"), which registers such companies in the register of operators of essential services after consultation with the relevant central government authority, such as the relevant ministry. Once a company is registered, it becomes critical from the FDI perspective and may therefore be subject to mandatory pre-closing FDI clearance.
The primary scope of the review is the assessment of the potential negative impact of the foreign investment on security and public order in Slovakia or other EU Member States.
Various additional factors are also considered during the screening process, including information concerning the Slovak target, the foreign investor and any entities controlling the foreign investor or controlled by the foreign investor.
During the screening process, the Ministry cooperates with other consulting authorities, including other ministries, the Slovak Information Service ("SIS") and the police.
With respect to NCFIs, based on a request by the foreign investor, the Ministry conducts an assessment of whether there is a risk of negative impact from the foreign investment. If no such risk is identified, the Ministry issues confirmation of this to the foreign investor and the Slovak target. However, if the Ministry identifies a potential risk, it may initiate a full screening procedure for the NCFI similar to the process applied to CFIs.
Failure to comply with obligations under the FDI Act may result in the Ministry imposing a fine of up to the value of the foreign investment or up to 2 percent of the foreign investor's annual turnover, whichever is higher.
The mandatory screening process commences only once the Ministry considers the screening application submitted by the foreign investor to be complete. This means that the decision period does not run while the foreign investor or the Slovak target supplements or corrects information, documents or explanations requested by the Ministry.
If no decision is issued by the Ministry or the Slovak government within 130 days from the commencement of the mandatory screening procedure, the CFI is deemed approved.
If the Ministry decides to reject a CFI, the Slovak government may veto this decision and ultimately approve the CFI.
In the case of an NCFI, the assessment procedure takes up to 45 days. If the Ministry does not initiate a full screening procedure within 45 days of receiving the assessment request, it is deemed that no risk of negative impact from the NCFI has been identified.
Considering that the average duration of screening proceedings is approximately 60 days for NCFIs and 85 days for CFIs, foreign investors, particularly those investing in CFIs, should not underestimate the time required for the screening process. It should be expected that the Ministry will issue follow-up questions regarding the foreign investment.
Foreign investors are therefore advised to prepare thoroughly for the process, monitor it closely and proactively communicate with the authorities to better anticipate and manage the screening process and its timeline.
Additional useful information can be found on the Ministry's website, where foreign investors have access to practical guidance on the FDI Act, the screening procedure and the annual summary report on the application of the FDI Act, all of which are also published in English. Although the FDI Act does not explicitly provide for this option, foreign investors may also informally consult the Ministry by email at fdiscreening@mhsr.sk to obtain preliminary information about whether a contemplated foreign investment is subject to mandatory FDI screening.
The number of applications for screening assessment is expected to remain consistent with previous years, with no significant increase anticipated due to uncertainty regarding economic growth in Slovakia and the EU. The Ministry's constructive and pro-business approach is likely to continue.
A planned amendment to the FDI Act is expected to align the legislation with needs arising from practical experience, although the timeline for its adoption remains uncertain. The amendment is also expected to address the planned revision of the EU FDI Screening Regulation.
White & Case means the international legal practice comprising White & Case LLP, a New York State registered limited liability partnership, White & Case LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated under English law and all other affiliated partnerships, companies and entities.
This article is prepared for the general information of interested persons. It is not, and does not attempt to be, comprehensive in nature. Due to the general nature of its content, it should not be regarded as legal advice.
© 2026 White & Case LLP