Canada
The Canadian government continues to scrutinize foreign investments by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from "non-like-minded" countries.
Now in its second decade of publication, White & Case's 2026 Foreign Direct Investment Reviews continue to provide a comprehensive overview of foreign direct investment ("FDI") laws and regulations across jurisdictions worldwide.
In this edition, we offer key datapoints to help inform parties and their advisors as they evaluate the evolving challenges presented by FDI screening requirements in cross-border transactions spanning multiple countries. National security-based FDI regimes continue to proliferate globally, with many jurisdictions adopting broader definitions of investments and the sectors subject to review continuing to expand.
FDI screening regimes are entering a more mature phase, and regulators are developing a more sophisticated approach to detecting and reviewing foreign investments. It is therefore critical to consider applicable FDI requirements as transactions, whether mergers and acquisitions, joint venture agreements, public equity offerings or financial restructurings, are negotiated. A clear understanding of potential challenges, the remedies that may be required for approval and the appropriate allocation of FDI risk can help avoid unwelcome surprises related to timing, deal certainty and the execution of business plans.
With a renewed US commitment to open foreign investment from allied countries, ongoing EU cooperation on FDI screening and evolving geopolitical dynamics, FDI screening will increasingly influence the selection of investors in cross-border transactions. New initiatives by the European Commission may also result in increased coordination among FDI authorities in EU Member States, all of which have adopted their own national FDI regimes by 2026.
We continue to believe that most cross-border transactions will be successfully completed in 2026, but understanding the regulatory and institutional parameters, as well as the evolving risks associated with FDI screening, will be critical to maintaining deal certainty and timing.
The Canadian government continues to scrutinize foreign investments by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from "non-like-minded" countries.
Foreign direct investment ("FDI"), whether undertaken directly or indirectly, is generally allowed without restrictions and without the need to obtain prior authorization from an administrative agency.
The landscape of foreign direct investment ("FDI") in the United States continues to evolve under the Trump administration. With expanded jurisdiction and authorities, mandatory filings applying in certain cases, an enhanced focus on a broad array of national security considerations, further attention and resources dedicated to monitoring, compliance and enforcement, and a substantially increased pursuit of non-notified transactions, the FDI apparatus in the United States is more empowered now than perhaps at any time in its history.
The European Union continues to be a driver of foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening, with coordinated and mandatory enforcement now on the horizon.
The wide scope, low trigger thresholds and broad interpretation of the Austrian Foreign Direct Investment ("FDI") regime require a thorough assessment and proactive planning throughout the mergers and acquisitions ("M&A") process.
The Belgian foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime entered into force in July 2023. Investors and authorities alike are still coming to grips with the regime and the limited guidance available to help parties navigate it.
On July 22, 2025, the Bulgarian Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) screening mechanism entered into effect. According to information provided by the screening authority (the "Screening Council"), during its first two months of operation (September and October 2025), the Screening Council approved 10 screening applications out of 11 filed during that period. The investment in all of the above instances originated from so-called "low-risk" countries, and the applications were cleared within a short time frame. As of January 1, 2026, the Screening Council does not yet have an online register, and at present there is no information about the number of filed or pending applications. There is also no information indicating that any FDI has been prohibited or approved subject to conditions.
Croatia introduced a foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime on November 13, 2025. As of January 1, 2026, the regime is not yet operational but expected to be implemented soon.
The Republic of Cyprus' ("RoC") new Foreign Direct Investment Screening Law (the "FDIS Law") will reshape the investment landscape from April 2, 2026, introducing look-back provisions, a screening remit, internal change trigger points, and relatively low notification thresholds.
The Czech Foreign Investments Screening Act took effect in May 2021, establishing the rights and duties of foreign investors and setting screening requirements for Czech targets.
The scope of the Danish foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime is comprehensive and requires a careful assessment of investments and agreements involving Danish companies.
The relevance of Estonia's foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening mechanism has remained modest since its inception at the end of 2023 but is expected to grow in light of the geopolitical situation, on account of increased activity in the defense sector.
Foreign direct investment ("FDI") deals are generally not blocked in Finland, but the government is able to monitor and, if necessary, restrict foreign investment.
French foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening continues to focus on foreign investments involving medical and biotech activities, food security activities or the treatment, storage and transmission of sensitive data. The nuclear ecosystem is subject to very close scrutiny. Around half of the transactions reviewed every year are subject to conditions or remedies, which is an important French specificity. Recent trends also show a growing number of transactions being reviewed, suggesting a shift toward increased scrutiny of foreign investments in France.
Following numerous amendments over the past years, Germany's foreign direct investment ("FDI") review continued in full swing, with further significant updates expected in the coming years.
Greece's mandatory and suspensory foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime became fully operational on November 11, 2025. Foreign investors must comply with notification requirements and consider review timelines in deal planning.
Hungary's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regimes faced temporary headwinds in 2025, but no lasting regulatory changes ultimately took hold.
Ireland's Screening of Third Country Transactions Act entered into force on January 6, 2025.
Italy's "Golden Power Law" review: Over a decade old, yet continuously expanding its reach.
The Latvian foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime applies to companies of significance to national security, as well as companies owning or possessing critical infrastructure. While the law does not provide a general notification obligation, specific rules establish sectoral FDI regimes for certain corporate mergers and acquisitions ("M&A"), real estate transactions, and gambling companies.
All investments concerning national security are within the scope of review in Lithuania.
Two years after its entry into force, the Luxembourg foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime has reached a solid level of maturity, and its requirements are now well understood by market stakeholders. The year 2025 proved to be particularly active and dynamic for M&A transactions in Luxembourg, notably involving targets in the financial sector, with multiple FDI filings submitted.
Malta's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime regulates specific transactions that must be notified to the authorities and may, in some instances, be subject to screening.
The Middle East continues to welcome foreign investment, subject to licensing approvals and ownership thresholds for certain business sectors or in certain geographical zones.
The Netherlands is set to expand its investment screening regime by extending the general mechanism to more sectors and by introducing additional sector-specific regulations.
Norway's foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime is anchored in the Norwegian Security Act (the "Security Act" or the "Act"), which imposes mandatory filing requirements for transactions involving companies designated as security sensitive. The Act also confers wide discretionary authority on Norwegian authorities to review and intervene in transactions involving non-designated companies where national security interests may be at risk.
In 2025, Poland's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime was made permanent, and responsibility for its enforcement was transferred to the Ministry of Finance and Economy.
In Portugal, transactions involving the acquisition of control over strategic assets by entities residing outside the European Union or the European Economic Area ("EEA") may be subject to foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening.
While far-reaching in its scope, compared with other countries in the European Union, the Romanian foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime is generally perceived as investor-friendly.
The year 2025 was not marked by any major changes in the sphere of regulation of foreign investments in Russia, and the regulator continues to implement the course on strengthening control taken earlier.
The year 2025 continued with the implementation of the course set earlier in 2023 and 2024, with few substantial updates to cybersecurity legislation extending FDI regulation to new fields of business critical for the Slovak Republic.
Since 2020, certain foreign direct investments ("FDI") have been subject to scrutiny in Spain. Additional formalities have since been introduced through developing FDI regulations that entered into force on September 1, 2023. As a result, FDI analysis is becoming increasingly important in the context of investments in Spain.
Entering its third year, Sweden's foreign direct investment ("FDI") Act remains a key consideration in a significant share of transactions involving Swedish companies.
Switzerland is set to introduce its first cross-sector foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime. On December 19, 2025, the Swiss Parliament approved the new FDI Act, Investitionsprüfgesetz, establishing a review mechanism focused on foreign state-controlled investors and security-sensitive sectors. The regime is expected to take effect in 2027 at the earliest.
Sustaining economic stability and building on the strong foreign direct investment ("FDI") momentum of 2025, Türkiye continues to prioritize policies that strengthen its position as an attractive and competitive investment hub.
During September and October 2025, the Ukrainian Parliament introduced an updated foreign investment screening framework, marking a significant step toward strengthening national security controls over inbound investments.
Foreign direct investment ("FDI") is permissible in the United Arab Emirates, subject to applicable licensing and ownership conditions.
Foreign direct investment ("FDI") in the United Kingdom is covered by the National Security and Investment Act ("NSIA") 2021 (which equally applies to UK purchasers), and in 2025 the government continued to update information and guidelines concerning the legislation.
Australia's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime underwent significant changes in 2025, including measures to streamline the process for assessing investment applications. Australia's new mandatory merger clearance regime also commenced January 1, 2026.
China continues to optimize its foreign investment environment by reducing investment restrictions, improving market access, and lowering investment thresholds for listed companies.
The Indian government has liberalized foreign direct investment ("FDI") rules in certain sectors, such as the space sector, in recent years and is laying the groundwork for 100 percent foreign investment in the insurance sector, while maintaining existing restrictions on investments from sensitive jurisdictions. This reflects the government's approach toward foreign investment: welcoming foreign capital where it aligns with India's strategic goals, while continuing to protect core interests.
The Japanese government is expanding the business sectors subject to Japan's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime, which covers not only investment but also voting and other actions, to secure stable supply chains and mitigate the risk of technology leakage and diversion of commercial technologies into military use.
The Republic of Korea ("Korea") is entering a more security-focused era of foreign direct investment ("FDI") regulation, with proposed amendments to the Foreign Investment Promotion Act ("FIPA") and longer screening processes requiring foreign investors to adopt proactive regulatory planning and heightened compliance.
Significant changes to the New Zealand overseas investment regime were passed into law in December 2025 and came into force on 6 March 2026. A number of these changes have made it considerably simpler and faster for overseas investors to acquire certain classes of New Zealand assets.
Taiwan continues to promote foreign direct investment ("FDI") under a two-track screening mechanism for foreign investors and People's Republic of China ("PRC") investors.
Australia's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime underwent significant changes in 2025, including measures to streamline the process for assessing investment applications. Australia's new mandatory merger clearance regime also commenced January 1, 2026.
Khyanne D'Sylva (White & Case) co-authored this publication
Australia requires a wide variety of proposed investments by foreign investors to be reviewed and approved before completion. The Treasurer of Australia, advised by the Foreign Investment Review Board ("FIRB"), determines whether foreign investments are approved or denied based on national interest and national security considerations.
Australia's foreign investment policy framework comprises the Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Act 1975 ("FATA") and its related regulations; the Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Fees Imposition Act 2015 (the "Fees Regime") and its related regulations; Australia's Foreign Investment Policy; and associated guidance notes.
A foreign person or entity (or an agent on behalf of the foreign entity) making an acquisition that requires approval under the FATA must apply to FIRB for a notification that the Treasurer has "no objection" to the acquisition before completion. In these circumstances, any agreement to make the acquisition must be conditional upon receipt of FIRB approval by the investor.
An application includes a filing fee that varies according to the type and value of the action being taken, the consideration payable and whether special fee rules apply. Fees for foreign investment applications cannot exceed a certain amount (the maximum fee). The amount of the maximum fee depends on the kind of application.
FIRB approval is required for various acquisitions by foreign persons.
These include:
National security businesses include those relating to critical infrastructure assets, telecommunications, defense or national intelligence communities. Starting a national security business also requires prior approval, irrespective of monetary value.
Approval is required to acquire an interest in national security land, such as defense premises or land in which a national intelligence community has an interest. Acquisitions of this type have no monetary threshold.
The regulations also cover diverse acquisitions of interests in Australian land and mining and production tenements, subject to varying monetary thresholds. This includes agricultural, residential, vacant and developed commercial land, and entities with 50 percent or more of their total asset value attributable to Australian land interests.
Types of investors also receive differing treatment, subject to their nationality or jurisdiction of incorporation. Each foreign investor should consider the applicable monetary threshold and other provisions relevant to it, with respect to a proposed acquisition.
Investors from specific countries benefit from higher monetary thresholds based on free trade agreements ("FTA"). However, the direct acquiring entity will also need to be from the relevant country for the higher thresholds to apply.
Generally, with respect to acquisitions of securities in an Australian entity, mandatory FIRB approval is only required where the monetary threshold exceeds AUD 347 million for investors from non-FTA countries, or AUD 1.498 billion for investors from FTA countries, except for national security, media businesses or sensitive businesses, Australian land corporations, or where the acquirer is a foreign government investor. In these situations, the monetary threshold is generally greatly reduced or, in most cases, nil.
Stricter rules apply to "foreign government investors," which can include domestic or offshore entities where a foreign government and its associates hold a direct or upstream interest of 20 percent or more, or foreign governments of more than one foreign country and their associates hold an aggregate interest of 40 percent or more. In general, unless an exemption applies, a foreign government investor must obtain FIRB approval before acquiring a "direct interest," generally defined as at least 10 percent holding or any percent with an ability to influence, participate in or control, in any Australian asset or entity; starting a new business; or acquiring mining, production or exploration interests.
The Treasurer may prohibit an investment if he or she believes it would be contrary to national interest or national security and, if approving the investment, may impose conditions on an approval to safeguard national interest or national security.
In making this decision, while the concept of "national interest" is not defined in the legislation, the Treasurer will broadly consider the impact on national security, taking into account the extent to which investments affect the Australian economy, competition or government policies.
These considerations include the impact of any plans to restructure an Australian enterprise following an acquisition; the nature of the funding of the acquisition and the level of Australian participation in the enterprise after the foreign investment occurs; the interests of employees, creditors and other stakeholders; and the extent to which the investor will develop the project and ensure a fair return for the Australian people. Consideration is also given to the character of the investor, including the extent to which the investor operates on a transparent commercial basis and is subject to adequate and transparent regulation and supervision.
The Treasurer will also consider whether a proposed investment may result in an investor gaining control over market pricing and production of a good or service in Australia, the effects of other Australian government laws and policies (including tax, environmental and critical technology laws) and objectives, and the impact of the investment on Australian tax revenues.
The "national security test" requires the Treasurer to assess a given investment from a national security perspective and whether the investment will affect Australia's ability to protect its strategic and security interests.
In making this assessment, the Treasurer relies on advice from the relevant national security agencies as to whether an investment raises national security issues, for example through foreign intrusion or espionage. This test is generally applied in circumstances where an investment involves a "national security business," "national security land" or falls within one of the sectors of interest (critical infrastructure, critical minerals, technology, etc.) for the Treasurer.
The decision as to what is contrary to the national interest or national security is at the sole discretion of the Treasurer.
Under the Act, the Treasurer has 30 days to consider an application and make a decision. However, in practice, the assessment process is often extended, typically eight to 12 weeks from the time of application to receipt of a "no objections" notification. The holiday period and federal government election periods usually impact these timeframes for decisions.
The timeframe for making a decision will not start until the correct application fee has been received by FIRB in full. If the Treasurer requests further information from the investor, the review period will be on hold until the request has been satisfied.
Typically, if FIRB requires further time, it will request that the applicant voluntarily extend the approval deadline. As the Treasurer is also entitled to unilaterally impose a 90-day extension under the statute, applicants are generally incentivized to "voluntarily" request the proposed deadline extensions, and in practice, the review process will take approximately eight to 12 weeks.
Foreign persons should file an application in advance of any transaction that requires FIRB approval, and any transaction requiring mandatory FIRB approval must be conditional on receipt of FIRB approval. Foreign investors should obtain appropriate advice at an early stage of the transaction with respect to the application of the Act whenever a transaction directly or indirectly involves the acquisition of Australian assets. A transaction requiring mandatory FIRB approval should not proceed to completion until the Treasurer advises on the outcome of his or her review.
Particularly for applications related to sensitive or national security businesses (those with a nexus to the Australian defense force, public infrastructure, sensitive data, energy, ports, water, telecommunications, critical infrastructure/minerals, banking or media sectors), the Australian government encourages engagement with FIRB before filing applications for significant investments.
These early discussions serve as a valuable forum for foreign investors to gain insights into the intricacies of their application, discern any national interest concerns the government may have, and understand the potential conditions the Treasurer might impose upon approval. Such an understanding may result in foreign investors being able to structure transactions differently to mitigate adverse FIRB outcomes. Proactive and early engagement is also crucial in competitive bid scenarios to avoid situations where other bidders have already obtained FIRB approval.
Foreign investors also need to be aware of the sensitivity surrounding investment structures, profit shifting and the payment of Australian tax. Collaboration with tax advisors at the outset ensures that investment structures align with the parameters acceptable to the ATO, a critical consideration given the ATO's involvement in all approval processes, and the increasing imposition of tax conditions on approvals.
Transparency in disclosing upstream ownership details of the acquiring entity is also beneficial, including meeting the FIRB requirement to identify and disclose direct and indirect, legal and beneficial holders of a five percent or more interest in the acquiring entity to streamline the review process and mitigate unwarranted scrutiny by FIRB.
Australia's new mandatory merger clearance regime commenced on January 1, 2026. The long-standing voluntary and informal system is now replaced with a mandatory and suspensory regime. Under this regime, an acquisition must be notified if it has a nexus to Australia, results in a change of control, exceeds the specified monetary thresholds, and is not subject to any exemptions. Transactions that meet the thresholds but proceed without approval will be void.
For further information, please refer to the White & Case article: The transition to mandatory merger control in Australia: Key parameters of the new regime.
Treasury released a discussion paper seeking public feedback on proposed reforms designed to further streamline and strengthen Australia's foreign investment framework. The reforms seek to ease the regulatory burden on low-risk, trusted investors while introducing tighter rules for sensitive and emerging sectors. Overall, the reforms aim to maintain Australia's appeal as an investment destination while addressing evolving risks to the national interest and national security in a complex international environment. Treasury is currently in the process of reviewing the submissions received.
White & Case means the international legal practice comprising White & Case LLP, a New York State registered limited liability partnership, White & Case LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated under English law and all other affiliated partnerships, companies and entities.
This article is prepared for the general information of interested persons. It is not, and does not attempt to be, comprehensive in nature. Due to the general nature of its content, it should not be regarded as legal advice.
© 2026 White & Case LLP