Canada
The Canadian government continues to scrutinize foreign investments by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from "non-like-minded" countries.
Now in its second decade of publication, White & Case's 2026 Foreign Direct Investment Reviews continue to provide a comprehensive overview of foreign direct investment ("FDI") laws and regulations across jurisdictions worldwide.
In this edition, we offer key datapoints to help inform parties and their advisors as they evaluate the evolving challenges presented by FDI screening requirements in cross-border transactions spanning multiple countries. National security-based FDI regimes continue to proliferate globally, with many jurisdictions adopting broader definitions of investments and the sectors subject to review continuing to expand.
FDI screening regimes are entering a more mature phase, and regulators are developing a more sophisticated approach to detecting and reviewing foreign investments. It is therefore critical to consider applicable FDI requirements as transactions, whether mergers and acquisitions, joint venture agreements, public equity offerings or financial restructurings, are negotiated. A clear understanding of potential challenges, the remedies that may be required for approval and the appropriate allocation of FDI risk can help avoid unwelcome surprises related to timing, deal certainty and the execution of business plans.
With a renewed US commitment to open foreign investment from allied countries, ongoing EU cooperation on FDI screening and evolving geopolitical dynamics, FDI screening will increasingly influence the selection of investors in cross-border transactions. New initiatives by the European Commission may also result in increased coordination among FDI authorities in EU Member States, all of which have adopted their own national FDI regimes by 2026.
We continue to believe that most cross-border transactions will be successfully completed in 2026, but understanding the regulatory and institutional parameters, as well as the evolving risks associated with FDI screening, will be critical to maintaining deal certainty and timing.
The Canadian government continues to scrutinize foreign investments by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from "non-like-minded" countries.
Foreign direct investment ("FDI"), whether undertaken directly or indirectly, is generally allowed without restrictions and without the need to obtain prior authorization from an administrative agency.
The landscape of foreign direct investment ("FDI") in the United States continues to evolve under the Trump administration. With expanded jurisdiction and authorities, mandatory filings applying in certain cases, an enhanced focus on a broad array of national security considerations, further attention and resources dedicated to monitoring, compliance and enforcement, and a substantially increased pursuit of non-notified transactions, the FDI apparatus in the United States is more empowered now than perhaps at any time in its history.
The European Union continues to be a driver of foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening, with coordinated and mandatory enforcement now on the horizon.
The wide scope, low trigger thresholds and broad interpretation of the Austrian Foreign Direct Investment ("FDI") regime require a thorough assessment and proactive planning throughout the mergers and acquisitions ("M&A") process.
The Belgian foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime entered into force in July 2023. Investors and authorities alike are still coming to grips with the regime and the limited guidance available to help parties navigate it.
On July 22, 2025, the Bulgarian Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) screening mechanism entered into effect. According to information provided by the screening authority (the "Screening Council"), during its first two months of operation (September and October 2025), the Screening Council approved 10 screening applications out of 11 filed during that period. The investment in all of the above instances originated from so-called "low-risk" countries, and the applications were cleared within a short time frame. As of January 1, 2026, the Screening Council does not yet have an online register, and at present there is no information about the number of filed or pending applications. There is also no information indicating that any FDI has been prohibited or approved subject to conditions.
Croatia introduced a foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime on November 13, 2025. As of January 1, 2026, the regime is not yet operational but expected to be implemented soon.
The Republic of Cyprus' ("RoC") new Foreign Direct Investment Screening Law (the "FDIS Law") will reshape the investment landscape from April 2, 2026, introducing look-back provisions, a screening remit, internal change trigger points, and relatively low notification thresholds.
The Czech Foreign Investments Screening Act took effect in May 2021, establishing the rights and duties of foreign investors and setting screening requirements for Czech targets.
The scope of the Danish foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime is comprehensive and requires a careful assessment of investments and agreements involving Danish companies.
The relevance of Estonia's foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening mechanism has remained modest since its inception at the end of 2023 but is expected to grow in light of the geopolitical situation, on account of increased activity in the defense sector.
Foreign direct investment ("FDI") deals are generally not blocked in Finland, but the government is able to monitor and, if necessary, restrict foreign investment.
French foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening continues to focus on foreign investments involving medical and biotech activities, food security activities or the treatment, storage and transmission of sensitive data. The nuclear ecosystem is subject to very close scrutiny. Around half of the transactions reviewed every year are subject to conditions or remedies, which is an important French specificity. Recent trends also show a growing number of transactions being reviewed, suggesting a shift toward increased scrutiny of foreign investments in France.
Following numerous amendments over the past years, Germany's foreign direct investment ("FDI") review continued in full swing, with further significant updates expected in the coming years.
Greece's mandatory and suspensory foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime became fully operational on November 11, 2025. Foreign investors must comply with notification requirements and consider review timelines in deal planning.
Hungary's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regimes faced temporary headwinds in 2025, but no lasting regulatory changes ultimately took hold.
Ireland's Screening of Third Country Transactions Act entered into force on January 6, 2025.
Italy's "Golden Power Law" review: Over a decade old, yet continuously expanding its reach.
The Latvian foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime applies to companies of significance to national security, as well as companies owning or possessing critical infrastructure. While the law does not provide a general notification obligation, specific rules establish sectoral FDI regimes for certain corporate mergers and acquisitions ("M&A"), real estate transactions, and gambling companies.
All investments concerning national security are within the scope of review in Lithuania.
Two years after its entry into force, the Luxembourg foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime has reached a solid level of maturity, and its requirements are now well understood by market stakeholders. The year 2025 proved to be particularly active and dynamic for M&A transactions in Luxembourg, notably involving targets in the financial sector, with multiple FDI filings submitted.
Malta's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime regulates specific transactions that must be notified to the authorities and may, in some instances, be subject to screening.
The Middle East continues to welcome foreign investment, subject to licensing approvals and ownership thresholds for certain business sectors or in certain geographical zones.
The Netherlands is set to expand its investment screening regime by extending the general mechanism to more sectors and by introducing additional sector-specific regulations.
Norway's foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime is anchored in the Norwegian Security Act (the "Security Act" or the "Act"), which imposes mandatory filing requirements for transactions involving companies designated as security sensitive. The Act also confers wide discretionary authority on Norwegian authorities to review and intervene in transactions involving non-designated companies where national security interests may be at risk.
In 2025, Poland's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime was made permanent, and responsibility for its enforcement was transferred to the Ministry of Finance and Economy.
In Portugal, transactions involving the acquisition of control over strategic assets by entities residing outside the European Union or the European Economic Area ("EEA") may be subject to foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening.
While far-reaching in its scope, compared with other countries in the European Union, the Romanian foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime is generally perceived as investor-friendly.
The year 2025 was not marked by any major changes in the sphere of regulation of foreign investments in Russia, and the regulator continues to implement the course on strengthening control taken earlier.
The year 2025 continued with the implementation of the course set earlier in 2023 and 2024, with few substantial updates to cybersecurity legislation extending FDI regulation to new fields of business critical for the Slovak Republic.
Since 2020, certain foreign direct investments ("FDI") have been subject to scrutiny in Spain. Additional formalities have since been introduced through developing FDI regulations that entered into force on September 1, 2023. As a result, FDI analysis is becoming increasingly important in the context of investments in Spain.
Entering its third year, Sweden's foreign direct investment ("FDI") Act remains a key consideration in a significant share of transactions involving Swedish companies.
Switzerland is set to introduce its first cross-sector foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime. On December 19, 2025, the Swiss Parliament approved the new FDI Act, Investitionsprüfgesetz, establishing a review mechanism focused on foreign state-controlled investors and security-sensitive sectors. The regime is expected to take effect in 2027 at the earliest.
Sustaining economic stability and building on the strong foreign direct investment ("FDI") momentum of 2025, Türkiye continues to prioritize policies that strengthen its position as an attractive and competitive investment hub.
During September and October 2025, the Ukrainian Parliament introduced an updated foreign investment screening framework, marking a significant step toward strengthening national security controls over inbound investments.
Foreign direct investment ("FDI") is permissible in the United Arab Emirates, subject to applicable licensing and ownership conditions.
Foreign direct investment ("FDI") in the United Kingdom is covered by the National Security and Investment Act ("NSIA") 2021 (which equally applies to UK purchasers), and in 2025 the government continued to update information and guidelines concerning the legislation.
Australia's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime underwent significant changes in 2025, including measures to streamline the process for assessing investment applications. Australia's new mandatory merger clearance regime also commenced January 1, 2026.
China continues to optimize its foreign investment environment by reducing investment restrictions, improving market access, and lowering investment thresholds for listed companies.
The Indian government has liberalized foreign direct investment ("FDI") rules in certain sectors, such as the space sector, in recent years and is laying the groundwork for 100 percent foreign investment in the insurance sector, while maintaining existing restrictions on investments from sensitive jurisdictions. This reflects the government's approach toward foreign investment: welcoming foreign capital where it aligns with India's strategic goals, while continuing to protect core interests.
The Japanese government is expanding the business sectors subject to Japan's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime, which covers not only investment but also voting and other actions, to secure stable supply chains and mitigate the risk of technology leakage and diversion of commercial technologies into military use.
The Republic of Korea ("Korea") is entering a more security-focused era of foreign direct investment ("FDI") regulation, with proposed amendments to the Foreign Investment Promotion Act ("FIPA") and longer screening processes requiring foreign investors to adopt proactive regulatory planning and heightened compliance.
Significant changes to the New Zealand overseas investment regime were passed into law in December 2025 and came into force on 6 March 2026. A number of these changes have made it considerably simpler and faster for overseas investors to acquire certain classes of New Zealand assets.
Taiwan continues to promote foreign direct investment ("FDI") under a two-track screening mechanism for foreign investors and People's Republic of China ("PRC") investors.
The Japanese government is expanding the business sectors subject to Japan's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime, which covers not only investment but also voting and other actions, to secure stable supply chains and mitigate the risk of technology leakage and diversion of commercial technologies into military use.
Japan's Ministry of Finance ("MOF"), in coordination with relevant industry sector ministries, reviews FDI under the Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Act ("FEFTA"). FEFTA mandates review for a wide range of transactions and imposes a hair-trigger threshold, though certain exemptions may be available for qualifying investors in public market transactions who agree to comply with certain covenants.
Under FEFTA, filing requirements depend on the target's business activities. A foreign investor must submit a "prior notification" (a request for prior consent) and/or a post-transaction report through the Bank of Japan to MOF and the relevant ministries for any action classified as an "inward direct investment," defined broadly and covering noninvestment activities or a designated acquisition.
Foreign investors include individuals who do not reside in Japan, termed "nonresidents"; entities or other groups established under the laws or regulations of, or having their principal offices in, foreign countries; entities in which a foreign individual or entity holds 50 percent or more of the total voting rights; partnerships operating in the investment business in which 50 percent or more of the total capital has been contributed by foreign entities, foreign groups or nonresidents, or in which the majority of general partners are nonresidents; and entities in which the majority of directors or representative directors are nonresidents.
MOF and Japan's ministries with jurisdiction over the target entity's business review two types of transactions: inward direct investments and designated acquisitions.
The definition of inward direct investments is broad, as it can cover the acquisition of shares or voting rights, as well as the exercise of those rights. For example, a foreign investor's acquisition of one percent or more of a listed target entity's outstanding shares or total voting rights is considered an inward direct investment, as is any acquisition of shares, even a single share, of an unlisted target entity obtained from a resident shareholder.
Other inward direct investment scenarios include when a foreign investor obtains proxy voting authority at an unlisted company or obtains proxy voting authority equivalent to 10 percent or more of the total voting rights of a listed company.
The exercise of voting rights constitutes an inward direct investment where a foreign investor consents to material changes to the business purposes of an unlisted target company, regardless of ownership percentage, or a listed target company where the foreign investor owns one-third or more of the target company's total voting rights.
The same applies when the foreign investor consents to shareholder meeting proposals to nominate that foreign investor or certain related parties to the board, or to certain other extraordinary transactions such as a sale of the company, regardless of ownership percentage for an unlisted target company, or when holding one percent or more of the voting rights for a listed target company.
An inward direct investment also occurs where a foreign investor agrees with other foreign investors to jointly exercise their respective beneficially owned voting rights and the aggregate beneficially owned voting rights account for 10 percent or more of the total voting rights of a listed company; where a foreign investor lends more than ¥100 million (US$665,000) to a Japanese company and the company's debt to the foreign investor accounts for more than 50 percent of the company's debt; or where the foreign investor purchases corporate bonds that meet certain criteria, including that they amount to more than ¥100 million and account for more than 50 percent of the company's debt.
A designated acquisition is a transaction where a foreign investor acquires any shares, even just one share, of a nonlisted company from another foreign investor.
For inward direct investments, foreign investors are required to make a "prior notification" (request for prior consent) and/or a post-transaction filing through the Bank of Japan to MOF and relevant ministries, depending on several factors.
Prior notification filings are required if the target entity is engaged in a designated industry and the foreign investor meets certain criteria, such as having a particular nationality or having offices in certain locations, and does not otherwise qualify for exemptive relief.
Post-transaction filings are required for inward direct investments when the foreign investor has obtained prior notification approval and must be made within 45 days of completing the transaction.
For designated acquisitions, foreign investors are required to submit a prior notification filing if the target company is engaged in designated industries. Post-transaction filings are not generally required for designated acquisitions unless the foreign investor claimed an exemption to the prior notification filing.
Foreign investors must make prior notification filings within the six-month period prior to completion of the transaction. Approvals are valid until six months from the date on which the filings were officially received by the Bank of Japan.
By default, transactions subject to a prior notification filing cannot be closed until the expiration of a 30-calendar-day waiting period from the date on which MOF and the ministry having jurisdiction over the transaction received the filing. MOF and the relevant ministries can extend the waiting period up to five months if necessary for review.
If MOF and the relevant ministry find the transaction problematic in terms of national security, they may recommend that the foreign investor change or discontinue the transaction after consultation with the Council on Customs, Tariff, Foreign Exchange and Other Transactions. The foreign investor must notify MOF and the relevant ministry within 10 days whether it will accept the recommendation. If the foreign investor does not provide notice or refuses to accept the recommendation, MOF and the relevant ministries may order modification or termination of the transaction before the expiration date of the waiting period.
Foreign investors are categorized into four types under the exemptions from prior notification filings: foreign financial institutions; general investors; Type B Investors; and nonqualified foreign investors (which includes Type A Investors). The scope of the exemption differs depending on the type of foreign investor involved.
All of the exemptions are subject to compliance with three conditions:
In principle, whether an issuer's business is classified as being in a designated industry is determined based on the issuer's actual business. In practice, a filer makes the classification judgment based on publicly available information, such as company websites and commercial registries, as well as input from the issuer, if available.
Foreign investors may refer to, but cannot rely on, MOF's list of public companies, which preliminarily classifies businesses as being involved in "noncore sectors," "core sectors," "specified core sectors" or "undesignated sectors," based on survey responses.
For investors seeking flexibility and speed in response to market trends, such as investment funds, it may be worth considering making a prior notification filing more frequently than every six months for possible investments in a target company.
In most cases, after making a prior notification, filers receive questions from the regulator regarding their business or intended transactions with the issuer, and they may be asked to make covenants related to future potential transactions.
The Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry introduced example covenants on its website, including commitments not to propose abolishing or transferring certain businesses that would disrupt supply chains of national defense-related items; not to access the confidential company information; or to eliminate foreign government influence. There is room to negotiate covenant language, and filers may propose revisions to the ministries.
According to a public release from MOF in June 2024, the number of prefilings in fiscal year 2024 (April 2023 to March 2024) was 2,903, the largest number ever, showing a slight increase from 2,871 in fiscal year 2023. The number of filings made for investments in cybersecurity-related businesses continues to be the highest, and this trend is expected to continue. As noted below, however, changes to the categories of businesses subject to FDI filings, and potentially streamlining the cases to be reviewed, are under discussion.
There are sometimes significant delays in government reviews, and filers are occasionally requested to withdraw a filing so that the government can unofficially extend the review period. These requests appear to be increasing and are likely to continue as filing volumes grow. Filers should consider filing as early as possible.
Under the latest Coalition Agreement between the two ruling parties, the Liberal Democratic Party and the Japan Restoration Party, the government announced two major initiatives for the 2026 regular session of the Japanese Diet: (1) establishing a Japanese equivalent of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States ("CFIUS"), and (2) introducing a bill to tighten regulations on land acquisitions by foreign investors and foreign capital.
Additionally, several significant changes to Japan's FDI framework are under discussion. These include:
White & Case means the international legal practice comprising White & Case LLP, a New York State registered limited liability partnership, White & Case LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated under English law and all other affiliated partnerships, companies and entities.
This article is prepared for the general information of interested persons. It is not, and does not attempt to be, comprehensive in nature. Due to the general nature of its content, it should not be regarded as legal advice.
© 2026 White & Case LLP