Canada
The Canadian government continues to scrutinize foreign investments by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from "non-like-minded" countries.
Now in its second decade of publication, White & Case's 2026 Foreign Direct Investment Reviews continue to provide a comprehensive overview of foreign direct investment ("FDI") laws and regulations across jurisdictions worldwide.
In this edition, we offer key datapoints to help inform parties and their advisors as they evaluate the evolving challenges presented by FDI screening requirements in cross-border transactions spanning multiple countries. National security-based FDI regimes continue to proliferate globally, with many jurisdictions adopting broader definitions of investments and the sectors subject to review continuing to expand.
FDI screening regimes are entering a more mature phase, and regulators are developing a more sophisticated approach to detecting and reviewing foreign investments. It is therefore critical to consider applicable FDI requirements as transactions, whether mergers and acquisitions, joint venture agreements, public equity offerings or financial restructurings, are negotiated. A clear understanding of potential challenges, the remedies that may be required for approval and the appropriate allocation of FDI risk can help avoid unwelcome surprises related to timing, deal certainty and the execution of business plans.
With a renewed US commitment to open foreign investment from allied countries, ongoing EU cooperation on FDI screening and evolving geopolitical dynamics, FDI screening will increasingly influence the selection of investors in cross-border transactions. New initiatives by the European Commission may also result in increased coordination among FDI authorities in EU Member States, all of which have adopted their own national FDI regimes by 2026.
We continue to believe that most cross-border transactions will be successfully completed in 2026, but understanding the regulatory and institutional parameters, as well as the evolving risks associated with FDI screening, will be critical to maintaining deal certainty and timing.
The Canadian government continues to scrutinize foreign investments by state-owned enterprises and state-linked private investors, especially if from "non-like-minded" countries.
Foreign direct investment ("FDI"), whether undertaken directly or indirectly, is generally allowed without restrictions and without the need to obtain prior authorization from an administrative agency.
The landscape of foreign direct investment ("FDI") in the United States continues to evolve under the Trump administration. With expanded jurisdiction and authorities, mandatory filings applying in certain cases, an enhanced focus on a broad array of national security considerations, further attention and resources dedicated to monitoring, compliance and enforcement, and a substantially increased pursuit of non-notified transactions, the FDI apparatus in the United States is more empowered now than perhaps at any time in its history.
The European Union continues to be a driver of foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening, with coordinated and mandatory enforcement now on the horizon.
The wide scope, low trigger thresholds and broad interpretation of the Austrian Foreign Direct Investment ("FDI") regime require a thorough assessment and proactive planning throughout the mergers and acquisitions ("M&A") process.
The Belgian foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime entered into force in July 2023. Investors and authorities alike are still coming to grips with the regime and the limited guidance available to help parties navigate it.
On July 22, 2025, the Bulgarian Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) screening mechanism entered into effect. According to information provided by the screening authority (the "Screening Council"), during its first two months of operation (September and October 2025), the Screening Council approved 10 screening applications out of 11 filed during that period. The investment in all of the above instances originated from so-called "low-risk" countries, and the applications were cleared within a short time frame. As of January 1, 2026, the Screening Council does not yet have an online register, and at present there is no information about the number of filed or pending applications. There is also no information indicating that any FDI has been prohibited or approved subject to conditions.
Croatia introduced a foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime on November 13, 2025. As of January 1, 2026, the regime is not yet operational but expected to be implemented soon.
The Republic of Cyprus' ("RoC") new Foreign Direct Investment Screening Law (the "FDIS Law") will reshape the investment landscape from April 2, 2026, introducing look-back provisions, a screening remit, internal change trigger points, and relatively low notification thresholds.
The Czech Foreign Investments Screening Act took effect in May 2021, establishing the rights and duties of foreign investors and setting screening requirements for Czech targets.
The scope of the Danish foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime is comprehensive and requires a careful assessment of investments and agreements involving Danish companies.
The relevance of Estonia's foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening mechanism has remained modest since its inception at the end of 2023 but is expected to grow in light of the geopolitical situation, on account of increased activity in the defense sector.
Foreign direct investment ("FDI") deals are generally not blocked in Finland, but the government is able to monitor and, if necessary, restrict foreign investment.
French foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening continues to focus on foreign investments involving medical and biotech activities, food security activities or the treatment, storage and transmission of sensitive data. The nuclear ecosystem is subject to very close scrutiny. Around half of the transactions reviewed every year are subject to conditions or remedies, which is an important French specificity. Recent trends also show a growing number of transactions being reviewed, suggesting a shift toward increased scrutiny of foreign investments in France.
Following numerous amendments over the past years, Germany's foreign direct investment ("FDI") review continued in full swing, with further significant updates expected in the coming years.
Greece's mandatory and suspensory foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime became fully operational on November 11, 2025. Foreign investors must comply with notification requirements and consider review timelines in deal planning.
Hungary's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regimes faced temporary headwinds in 2025, but no lasting regulatory changes ultimately took hold.
Ireland's Screening of Third Country Transactions Act entered into force on January 6, 2025.
Italy's "Golden Power Law" review: Over a decade old, yet continuously expanding its reach.
The Latvian foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime applies to companies of significance to national security, as well as companies owning or possessing critical infrastructure. While the law does not provide a general notification obligation, specific rules establish sectoral FDI regimes for certain corporate mergers and acquisitions ("M&A"), real estate transactions, and gambling companies.
All investments concerning national security are within the scope of review in Lithuania.
Two years after its entry into force, the Luxembourg foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime has reached a solid level of maturity, and its requirements are now well understood by market stakeholders. The year 2025 proved to be particularly active and dynamic for M&A transactions in Luxembourg, notably involving targets in the financial sector, with multiple FDI filings submitted.
Malta's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime regulates specific transactions that must be notified to the authorities and may, in some instances, be subject to screening.
The Middle East continues to welcome foreign investment, subject to licensing approvals and ownership thresholds for certain business sectors or in certain geographical zones.
The Netherlands is set to expand its investment screening regime by extending the general mechanism to more sectors and by introducing additional sector-specific regulations.
Norway's foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime is anchored in the Norwegian Security Act (the "Security Act" or the "Act"), which imposes mandatory filing requirements for transactions involving companies designated as security sensitive. The Act also confers wide discretionary authority on Norwegian authorities to review and intervene in transactions involving non-designated companies where national security interests may be at risk.
In 2025, Poland's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime was made permanent, and responsibility for its enforcement was transferred to the Ministry of Finance and Economy.
In Portugal, transactions involving the acquisition of control over strategic assets by entities residing outside the European Union or the European Economic Area ("EEA") may be subject to foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening.
While far-reaching in its scope, compared with other countries in the European Union, the Romanian foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime is generally perceived as investor-friendly.
The year 2025 was not marked by any major changes in the sphere of regulation of foreign investments in Russia, and the regulator continues to implement the course on strengthening control taken earlier.
The year 2025 continued with the implementation of the course set earlier in 2023 and 2024, with few substantial updates to cybersecurity legislation extending FDI regulation to new fields of business critical for the Slovak Republic.
Since 2020, certain foreign direct investments ("FDI") have been subject to scrutiny in Spain. Additional formalities have since been introduced through developing FDI regulations that entered into force on September 1, 2023. As a result, FDI analysis is becoming increasingly important in the context of investments in Spain.
Entering its third year, Sweden's foreign direct investment ("FDI") Act remains a key consideration in a significant share of transactions involving Swedish companies.
Switzerland is set to introduce its first cross-sector foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime. On December 19, 2025, the Swiss Parliament approved the new FDI Act, Investitionsprüfgesetz, establishing a review mechanism focused on foreign state-controlled investors and security-sensitive sectors. The regime is expected to take effect in 2027 at the earliest.
Sustaining economic stability and building on the strong foreign direct investment ("FDI") momentum of 2025, Türkiye continues to prioritize policies that strengthen its position as an attractive and competitive investment hub.
During September and October 2025, the Ukrainian Parliament introduced an updated foreign investment screening framework, marking a significant step toward strengthening national security controls over inbound investments.
Foreign direct investment ("FDI") is permissible in the United Arab Emirates, subject to applicable licensing and ownership conditions.
Foreign direct investment ("FDI") in the United Kingdom is covered by the National Security and Investment Act ("NSIA") 2021 (which equally applies to UK purchasers), and in 2025 the government continued to update information and guidelines concerning the legislation.
Australia's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime underwent significant changes in 2025, including measures to streamline the process for assessing investment applications. Australia's new mandatory merger clearance regime also commenced January 1, 2026.
China continues to optimize its foreign investment environment by reducing investment restrictions, improving market access, and lowering investment thresholds for listed companies.
The Indian government has liberalized foreign direct investment ("FDI") rules in certain sectors, such as the space sector, in recent years and is laying the groundwork for 100 percent foreign investment in the insurance sector, while maintaining existing restrictions on investments from sensitive jurisdictions. This reflects the government's approach toward foreign investment: welcoming foreign capital where it aligns with India's strategic goals, while continuing to protect core interests.
The Japanese government is expanding the business sectors subject to Japan's foreign direct investment ("FDI") regime, which covers not only investment but also voting and other actions, to secure stable supply chains and mitigate the risk of technology leakage and diversion of commercial technologies into military use.
The Republic of Korea ("Korea") is entering a more security-focused era of foreign direct investment ("FDI") regulation, with proposed amendments to the Foreign Investment Promotion Act ("FIPA") and longer screening processes requiring foreign investors to adopt proactive regulatory planning and heightened compliance.
Significant changes to the New Zealand overseas investment regime were passed into law in December 2025 and came into force on 6 March 2026. A number of these changes have made it considerably simpler and faster for overseas investors to acquire certain classes of New Zealand assets.
Taiwan continues to promote foreign direct investment ("FDI") under a two-track screening mechanism for foreign investors and People's Republic of China ("PRC") investors.
The Republic of Cyprus' ("RoC") new Foreign Direct Investment Screening Law (the "FDIS Law") will reshape the investment landscape from April 2, 2026, introducing look-back provisions, a screening remit, internal change trigger points, and relatively low notification thresholds.
Leandros Papaphilippou, Pantelis Christofides, George Valiantis, Marios Menelaou, Irene Christina Anthi Christofide, Christina Paraskeva and Irene Skitsa (L Papaphilippou & Co LLC) and Maria Vasileiadi (White & Case) co-authored this publication
The Establishment of the Framework for the FDIS Law of 2025 (Law 194(I)/2025) was published in the RoC Official Gazette on November 14, 2025. On March 27, 2026, the RoC Ministry of Finance ("MoF") announced that the FDIS Law will take legal effect on April 2, 2026. The MoF is the competent authority and contact point under Regulation (EU) 2019/452 and has also launched a dedicated FDI screening webpage, through which interested parties can access contact details for the competent authority, a draft Notification Form dated March 16, 2026, and a List of Supporting Documents relating to a notification.
The FDIS Law concerns inbound foreign direct investments ("FDI") and introduces a number of novel features.
A key development is the introduction of significant look-back provisions. The MoF may screen any FDI, irrespective of whether it falls within the framework of obligatory notification, where there are valid reasons to consider that the FDI could affect the security or public order of the RoC. In particular, where the FDI:
Another important feature is the forthcoming establishment of the Advisory Committee, which is composed of representatives of the competent ministries. The Advisory Committee provides information and reasoned written advice to the MoF regarding notified FDIs and is, among other things, entitled to call before it representatives of a ministry, deputy ministry or other service, as well as representatives of the private sector, professional associations or other stakeholders, to provide their expertise, subject to a conflict check and confidentiality declaration. The reasoned written advice to the MoF is based on a written suggestion from the representative of the ministry, deputy ministry or other service within whose jurisdiction the FDI under screening primarily falls.
A further implementation step occurred on March 27, 2026, when the MoF announced the commencement date of the FDIS Law and published, on its dedicated FDI screening webpage, a draft Notification Form and a List of Supporting Documents. These materials provide additional practical guidance on the information and documentation expected to accompany a notification.
A foreign investor intending to proceed with an FDI is required to notify the MoF of the investment by submitting a written application prior to its materialization.
The term "foreign investor" refers to:
"Materialization of investment" refers to the point in time at which the final condition precedent connected with the investment decision of the parties to a foreign investment transaction is fulfilled, while "transaction" refers to any acquisition, agreement or other financial activity that leads to the acquisition of the entirety of, or part of, or any interest in, an undertaking within the RoC.
The notification obligation arises where the following criteria are cumulatively met:
"Special participation" is considered the acquisition, whether directly or indirectly, in isolation or in concert with other persons, of a percentage corresponding to at least 25 percent of the share capital and/or voting rights, or a corresponding possibility of exercising decisive influence over the undertaking's activities.
Thus, even where EU, EEA or Swiss citizens participate in the undertaking concerned, the prospective acquisition of special participation by a foreign investor could still trigger the screening process, with the MoF looking through to the ultimate investor or ultimate beneficial owner.
In addition, any undertaking, organization, foundation or other legal entity in which at least 25 percent of the share capital and/or voting rights is held by a foreign investor, and/or where the ultimate beneficial owner is a foreign investor, and/or in which the foreign investor possesses, directly or indirectly, control of such entity, and which intends to proceed with an FDI in an undertaking of strategic importance (meeting the cumulative criteria above), is subject to the notification obligation.
Finally, a further increase of special participation that results in the foreign investor's share capital and/or voting rights moving (a) from below 25 percent to 25 percent or more, or (b) from below 50 percent to 50 percent or more, also gives rise to a notification obligation, irrespective of the FDI value.
The FDIS Law explicitly refers, as to its scope, to undertakings of strategic importance, that is, undertakings performing activities falling within particularly sensitive sectors, as defined in the FDIS Law Annex. The term "undertaking" refers to:
"Control" refers to the possibility of exercising decisive influence over the activities of an undertaking, organization, club, foundation or other legal entity, in particular through:
FDIs that concern ships under construction, or ships that constitute the subject matter of sale or purchase, other than Floating Storage and Regasification Units (FSRUs), are exempt from the notification obligation.
The FDIS Law sets out expansive criteria and a wide range of factors the MoF may consider when screening an FDI.
First, the factors taken into consideration by the MoF in evaluating whether an FDI is likely to affect the security or public order of the RoC, include, among others:
Second, the MoF may also consider:
Finally, any contract, agreement or transaction requiring prior approval under the FDIS Law is deemed subject to a condition precedent of obtaining that approval.
Indicative FDI screening timeframes are as follows:
Phase I: The MoF will decide, after consulting the Advisory Committee, within 20 business days of receipt of a complete FDI notification whether the transaction will be subject to screening. During this initial assessment, the MoF may request additional data, information, explanations or clarifications. The 20-business-day timeframe is suspended until the requested information is submitted. If the MoF determines that the FDI will not undergo screening, it notifies the foreign investor within five business days of that decision.
Phase II: If the MoF determines that the notified FDI is subject to screening, it notifies the foreign investor within five business days. The MoF then decides, within 65 business days, from the date it designates the FDI under screening, whether the FDI could affect the security or public order of the RoC. This timeframe is suspended if additional information is requested, until such information is provided.
During this process, the MoF consults the Advisory Committee, which may request the appearance of the foreign investor or its legitimate representative to provide clarifications. Nothing in the FDIS Law restricts the European Commission's jurisdiction to issue an opinion or the right of other EU Member States to submit comments under Regulation (EU) 2019/452.
If the MoF concludes that an FDI does not affect the security or public order of the RoC, it informs the foreign investor within five business days. If it concludes otherwise, the MoF may impose conditions or prohibit, terminate or reverse the FDI and will notify the foreign investor accordingly.
In preparation for the entry into force of the FDIS Law, the MoF has also published a draft Notification Form and a List of Supporting Documents, which give investors additional visibility into the expected filing process.
A foreign investor should consider at the outset, prior to engaging in the concentration control or corporate law due diligence process, whether:
Foreign investors should also review the draft Notification Form and List of Supporting Documents published by the MoF, as these materials provide an early indication of the content, supporting evidence and level of detail likely to be required in practice.
This evaluation must be carried out on a case-by-case basis, particularly as MoF decisions will not be published. Two further issues merit close attention:
Foreign investors should also be mindful of the possible outcomes of the screening process, as well as the sanctions that may apply. Any MoF decision issued under the FDIS Law may be challenged through an administrative recourse before the Administrative Court under Article 146 of the Constitution. Where circumstances so dictate, the MoF is entitled to:
Failure to notify a notifiable FDI constitutes an automatic breach of the FDIS Law. In such cases, the MoF may take any measures at its disposal to prohibit, terminate or reverse the relevant FDI, including applying to a competent RoC court for prohibitory, mandatory or interim orders.
In addition, the MoF may impose administrative sanctions, including administrative fines, on a foreign investor or any person exercising direct or indirect control over the FDI in the event of an infringement or omission to comply with the provisions of the FDIS Law, including:
Lastly, foreign investors may wish to include protective contractual mechanisms, such as purchase price adjustment or re-evaluation clauses linked to potential MoF conditions.
Further clarity is expected in the event the Council of Ministers exercises the discretion thereof to issue the regulations foreseen under the FDIS Law. These regulations will address, among other matters, procedural aspects of the notification process. In the meantime, the MoF has already taken initial implementation steps by publishing a dedicated FDI screening webpage, a draft Notification Form, and a List of Supporting Documents.
It is also expected that the MoF will issue, within 15 months from April 2, 2026, a report concerning the application of the FDIS Law. This report is expected to provide aggregated data, which could offer a certain degree of clarity with respect to:
Commercially sensitive information, personal data as defined in Regulation (EU) 2016/679, or information the publication of which could pose a risk to the security or public order of the RoC will not be disclosed as part of the report.
White & Case means the international legal practice comprising White & Case LLP, a New York State registered limited liability partnership, White & Case LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated under English law and all other affiliated partnerships, companies and entities.
This article is prepared for the general information of interested persons. It is not, and does not attempt to be, comprehensive in nature. Due to the general nature of its content, it should not be regarded as legal advice.
© 2026 White & Case LLP